The Andromeda Strain (TV Mini Series 2008) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
180 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
This is the MTV version
siderite4 June 2008
During the late sixties, Michael Crichton wrote a novel about contamination with an alien microorganism. At that time, science was hailed as the pinnacle of human achievement and it was thought that anything is possible. Therefore it is normal for the book and the subsequent film from 1971 to focus on the science, on the formalism, on the way people think their way out of a situation.

Fast forward to 2008. People are dumber, science is a joke, people need to look good and the design must be perfect. Some horrible deaths and some fear of government conspiracy or terrorism is the only way tension can be achieved.

The problem is that I have anticipated this. My own theory says that if you expect it to happen, there won't be a negative response, yet I am terribly angry at this mini series BECAUSE it was exactly what I expected. Things have been added to the original story that make no sense and make no sense to add: government black ops, wormholes, message from the future, ecological controversy over ocean vent mining, etc, etc. As expected the effects were really good, the people looked good, the computer interface design was flawless. And it all fell completely empty.

If you are familiar to The Andromeda Strain book or 1971 movie, you might find it interesting to see how it can go horribly wrong. Otherwise, just watch the 1971 version. It is slow paced, faithful to the book and a lot more interesting.
102 out of 115 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Did they miss any Sci Fi clichés?
ikanboy28 May 2008
This starts off well, and if you're hoping for Crichton's complex/tense gem of a novel you'll soon be disappointed. They throw every sci fi cliché into this one. The evil govt. conspiracy (to get the master weapon); the plucky reporter; a nuke; a master monster; plenty of sci fi babble; and in the end a 10-9-8 countdown-will our hero be able to save himself and his team-followed by a "it's not over yet" fade out. Just when you think they've run out of clichés they pull another one out and throw it at you.

Ridley Scott you should be ashamed of yourself!This blots your copy book big time! LUDICROUS!!!! For teens only; they'll think it's cool!
46 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
From New Mexico to Utah, and from brilliant to average...
Coventry3 October 2021
Having recently re-watched the 1971-version of "The Andromeda Strain" taught me one thing: the original is still a near-perfect Sci-Fi landmark and never will a remake, whether in the form of a film or a mini-series, be any better.

But okay, I'm not here to elaborate on the superiority of the Robert Wise classic. The mini-series has reason to exist as well, although it never really surpasses the quality-level of "average". Literally everything about "The Andromeda Strain" 2008 is average;- whether it comes to the added storylines versus the original film, the acting performances, the action/horror sequences, or the special effects. The foundations of Michael Crichton's genius novel are luckily kept intact, give or take a few minor details. When a satellite crashes back onto earth, almost the entire population of the nearby little town Piedmont, Utah, literally drops dead. In the original film, Piedmont was located in New Mexico, but I guess that's one of the few minor details. A handful of eminent scientists are escorted from all corners of the US of A to a top-secret governmental underground facility in the desert to examine the unearthly substance attached to the satellite. What's different or additional compared to the '71 version is that there's a sub-plot with a research journalist, bigger political involvement (including a role for the US-President), nastier intentions by the military and a couple of utterly grotesque theories with wormholes.

People like Benjamin Bratt and Christa Miller are decent performers, but they fail to be very plausible as brilliant scientists. Still, they are not as implausible as - say - the numerous mutations of the virus, or the insane explanations of where it supposedly comes from. The mini-series was released in the same year as the original author, the mighty Michael Crichton, passed away. I sincerely hope this wasn't the last adaptation of his work that he had to see.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
all visuals, no story
ronc-518 November 2011
There is a certain type of movie. It's usually a made-for-TV movie, and it's usually an "updated" remake of an older movie.

The cast and story elements are painfully politically correct.

The writers appear to labor under the mistaken assumption that the viewer really doesn't need to be told a coherent story as long as there are a few visual elements from the original and some handsome-looking people emoting at each other. And things blowing up.

If there was a punchline to the original, the film will either ignore, misinterpret, or completely blow it.

The remake of Lathe of Heaven (2002)was such a film.

The remake of The Andromeda Strain (2008) is also such a film. It takes the tight script and edge-of-seat stress and paranoia of the original and substitutes digital effects, things blowing up, and absolutely nonsensical plot. When the time comes for the big reveal (which I won't reveal here), instead of the insightful political message of the original, we get a sophomoric, pasted-on ending that doesn't relate to what's gone before and basically contains no message whatsoever, but does allow one last digital effect.

It's not even bad enough to be good in a campy way. It's just dreary and indecipherable. See the original instead.
26 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Why This Remake?
claudio_carvalho17 September 2008
When the capsule of the Scoop Mission returns to Earth and lands in the small town of Piedmont, Utah, it brings a mutant living being and all the population, except a crying baby and an old man with ulcer, dies with clotted blood. A team of five scientists - the leader Dr. Jeremy Stone (Benjamin Bratt), Dr. Angela Noyce (Christa Miller), Dr. Tsi Chou (Daniel Dae Kim), Dr. Charlene Barton (Viola Davis) and Major Bill Keane MD (Ricky Schroder) - are summoned and gathered together in the top secret Wildfire facility. Fighting against time, they try to understand the reason why the old man and the baby survived and research an antidote to Andromeda, the ultimate biological weapon.

I wrote the above summary – with the exceptions of the names of Dr. Stone's scientist's team – in my review of the original sci-fi classic of 1971. The great pacifist story is basically the same, only longer due to updates in special effects and useless subplots with government conspiracies. I usually hate remakes, but sometimes I find reasonable surprises; but I do not know the objective of this tiresome and totally unnecessary remake. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "O Enigma de Andrômeda" ("The Enigma of Andromeda")
21 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not the same as the movie
TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews1 July 2009
I have not read Crichton's novel, and have no intention of ever doing so, so I cannot compare either version to it, only the two to each other. This aired as four one-hour episodes, with commercials, so without, the running time was probably around 180 minutes. That gives it more time to explore the concept, and though some of it is used on action(!) and pushing PC(not computer, the other kind) messages, it is utilized. This very much tries to "update" the story. Where the original had a masterfully established atmosphere of isolation, claustrophobia and sterility, in the design of the lab, this one has it be high-tech and futuristic(because they can), and has plenty of scenes taking place outside of it as well as contact between inside and out. The subtle, skillful and careful cinematography and editing of the film are discarded for stylizing the crap out of a lot of what we see, and at least a little of it is frankly silly. This has excellent special effects, and it does tend to be well-shot. Dialog and acting are good, if Miller is so similar to her recurring role on Scrubs that it is a constant distraction. The plot is reasonable, and develops nicely. This has a couple of interesting science fiction ideas gone over. I recommend this to fans of virus flicks. 7/10
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Comparable to the original, but more action and less science
paulyork6 March 2018
Both the original and the remake are with seeing. The original is slower, less action, but mores science, and the remake is fast-faced as is normal in today's thrillers. They're both good. The twists in the remake regarding the source of the virus were convoluted and at times a bit implausible. In the original it is just some random space virus from a comet -- more plausible. Having just seen the remake it makes me want to see the original again, after many years.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Terribly Overwrought and Clichéd, with horrible "Action"
imdb-474015 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This miniseries was mostly a 7.5 or so for me, until the last half of the final part where they proceeded to:

  • Basically ignore (they threw in a casual explanation) the two survivors of Piedmont sub-plot


  • Ignore the sub-plot (even if it was a horribly clichéd one) of the estranged wife of Dr Stone, and rebellious son


  • Ignore the fact that there were airborne rubber eating Andromedas above Piedmont when the helicopters flew over


  • Turn the Andromeda strain into a visible on-screen entity


  • Provide no clear reason for why Dae Kims character died upon throwing a thumb


  • Flub the ending of the reporter sub-plot, so it became a total "Who Cares?"


  • Give Andromeda an actual (and completely dumb) origin, rather than leave it mysterious like the novel


  • Bore us all to death with environmentalist clichéd 1960s Star Trek-esquire moralising


  • Bore us past death to "government conspiracy" plot line that's so horribly overdone


  • Provide no reason as to why there was lots of rubble falling down the central shaft


But perhaps the most burning of the flaws with this miniseries was the action that occurred when the nuclear fail-safe was activated. Besides being motivated by a plot contrivance rather than logically occurring as it did in the novel, it was also horribly dragged out.

I recorded this and watched it back via Sky+ (Tivo-esque machine for those of you not in the UK) and I must have fast forwarded through most of that climbing and crawling sequence. It actually seemed to me like because they had a few ex-24 stars, they felt like the thing needed to happen in real time.

Do film-makers really think we need to see every excruciating detail of climbing up ladders, climbing down ladders, throwing thumbs, climbing into vents, climbing out of vents, crawling across a floor, crawling up a wall, struggling to remove a key-card, struggling to remove a thumb.

Just get to the point, we don't want to see 10 minutes of padding in a 15 minute "action" sequence!
87 out of 103 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
What a ride!
staljen29 April 2008
I'll admit there's some flaws in this mini-series. The acting is good but not superb, some characters felt unnecessary, some of the script could use reworking and the some of the effects were a little sub par.

But if you're willing to overlook this then you're in for a treat! What a ride! I started to watch The Andromeda Strain without any expectations and was a little skeptical in the beginning but it shaped up and turned out to be really great. Total run time is about two hours and forty minutes and once it sucked me in it entertained me all the way through with exciting and fast paced action that kept me on my toes wondering what would happen next.

I'll give it 8.5/10 and it deserves it.
26 out of 81 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A remake is often a banana skin on which you slide
Dr_Coulardeau1 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The film is on a banal, very banal subject : the invasion of the earth by some extraterrestrial civilization. In this case the interesting element is the method used to take over, and clean up the planet of the human race that is kind of in the way. They use the curiosity of this human race and infiltrate a satellite that is devised to capture living and unknown extraterrestrial organisms or substances. It does crop one substance hat is living but with no DNA. That substance will cause the satellite to crash back on the earth, without being in any way damaged, which is quite hard to believe today. This satellite will be recuperated by some people in a close-by city, opened and the substance will spread and kill everyone except an alcoholic who uses methylated spirit to satisfy his thirst and a new-born baby. The objective is to cause an overreaction among the human collective body called society and for them humans to try to destroy this invading substance with a nuclear missile. And that's the trick. This substance is fed by nuclear radiations or feeds on nuclear radiations. This fact is discovered by the scientists who are trying to understand the phenomenon, the counter order is given to the pilot delivering the missile and she turns back, but it is too late: the substance had already invaded the plane and it took control of it and the missile will eventually reach its target and humanity will be destroyed entirely. All that because of the human vain belief that one single invention, destructive substance or mechanism can be supreme and destroy everything, which is false, and we know it, since cockroaches for one are not at all disturbed in their very busy life by nuclear radiations. What is surprising is that this film, done for TV, should be so poor on the characters as if television did not have the means to hire good authors, directors and actors any more. Too bad, indeed.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Possibly the dumbest TV miniseries ever
Captain Ed10 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
When I first heard that A&E remade the sci-fi classic The Andromeda Strain as a four-hour miniseries, I immediately made it a high priority for this week's viewing. I read the book repeatedly as a boy, so much so that my father still jokes about it. The original movie followed the book rather closely, but it dragged; except for the first 20 minutes and the last 30, the pace could cure insomnia.

After seeing part 1, I can say that the producers have cured that problem, but at the expense of making the story almost unrecognizable. As in the original, the plot involves a covert effort by the American government to find biological material in space that could be used as a weapon on earth, but unlike the original, we know that immediately. In attempting to cover that up, some members of the government try blaming the North Koreans for infecting the damaged satellite, even though as one character finally points out, why would Pyongyang spend all the money to send a biological weapon into space hoping an American satellite would come close enough to it to hit it and trust that said satellite would hit the US? The character who says that points out that Homeland Security can't be bothered to inspect most shipping, leaving that method wide open.

And that brings us to some of the other updates. Everyone has personal problems in this remake; the Head Scientist has a bipolar wife, the Nosy Reporter has a cocaine addiction, three of the main characters have unresolved personal conflicts from the war. It's all very Lifetime Channel in that sense. Worse, though, are the little zingers that the writers of the remake put into the script about the current war and administration. When the Utah National Guard gets mobilized to quarantine the area, the Nosy Reporter tells his television audience that the UNG expects the call-up to be brief and says with a smirk, "Where have we heard that before?" One character postulates that the US supplied Saddam with all of his biological weapons, and so on. These pop up on a regular basis about every 20 minutes during the first installment.

At the end of the first episode, the political correctness had pretty much run amuck, or so we thought. In the finale, we got even more than I thought could be crammed into a four-hour show. A crisis over "vent mining" on the ocean floor turns into a terrorist crisis, but that's not the end of that subplot. Two of the doctors fall in love when they're supposed to be saving the world. The one military doctor turns out to be gay, and since he's the key man, it gives him an opportunity to say, "It's ironic. The one person the military most fears turns out to be the one they trust to save the day." Even those of us who think don't-ask-don't-tell is hypocritical rolled their eyes at that development, which had nothing to do with anything else in the movie.

But that's just the beginning of the stupidity. It turns out that Andromeda is a messenger from the nearby wormhole. The message? "Don't mess with vent mining". The entire infection comes from our future, where vent mining apparently turned out worse than what the hysterics fantasize about pumping oil out of ANWR. Humanity send Andromeda and its packing material back to the past as a message, based in binary code hidden deep within the molecular structure, to tell us to leave Mother Earth alone.

Of course, no one bothers to ask why Future Earth does this in a way that would kill every living organism on Past Earth. No one in the script conference that created this bothered to ask why Future Earth wouldn't just send a metal plate through the wormhole that said, "HEY! STOP VENT MINING! LOVE, YOUR GRANDCHILDREN". Wouldn't that have been more effective and a lot less likely to, say, kill all of Future Earth's ancestors? Maybe we could send a message back that said, "HEY! WE'LL STOP VENT MINING WHEN YOU QUIT PLAYING WITH KILLER ORGANISMS! LOVE, GRANDMA AND GRANDPA". We can send that with some influenza as payback.

The ending provides the biggest unintentional laughs. The military doctor has been designated the key man, the one who has to stop the self-destruct sequence of the laboratory that will provide unimaginable power to Andromeda for mutations. Unlike in the novel, he dies when he falls in the tunnel into a pool of water used by the nuclear reactor, just as he hands off the key that will stop the sequence to the project leader. Unfortunately, the key sequence requires the military doctor's thumb for identification, which leads another doctor to do a Mr. Spock (Wrath of Khan) and go into the water to cut off the thumb. He then throws the thumb straight up for two stories to the project leader who's hanging on the side of the wall, complete with a close-up, slo-mo sequence of the thumb tumbling towards the hero as the self-sacrificing doctor dies in a pool of water that wouldn't be radioactive anyway.

It provides a perfect analogy to the entire movie. The only way this mess should get a thumbs-up is if a reviewer cut one off in protest and threw it in the air. The rest of the ending is fairly anticlimactic, with a few assorted assassinations as everyone starts covering up the government's role in the affair. Everyone's loved ones suddenly finds themselves free of the personal problems that plagued them. The President declares that he'll continue vent mining despite the strongly-worded memo from the future, which makes sense; I'd try to kill Future Earth too, after a stunt like Andromeda.

What a shame. It could have been interesting; instead, it gives a peek into the mind of the politically-correct paranoids who produced this dreck.
31 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great little mini series!
silkroadathens30 April 2008
Andromeda Strain... if you haven't figured out already this is a SCI-FI tech based mini-series/TV movie. So if you really hate scientific jargon this movie may bother you, because there are some scenes containing a fair bit of jargon. The cgi was fairly well done and the acting was better than some movies that are currently out. I haven't seen the original Andromeda strain so I wouldn't know the similarities, but this series ends with a lot unanswered, some characters are just forgotten throughout the movie rendering the little characterization that was built useless...Personally, I enjoyed the series overall, it was easy to follow and the cliff hanger from episode 1 was brutal...I had to see the rest! I actually wish it was more than two episodes long...
16 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Comment On Politically Correct Wildfire Team
carolynhotstuff27 May 2008
In giving their opinion of the mini-series some people seem to be upset by the fact that the Wildfire Team was made up of Black, Asian and Latin actors. If the mini-series had been cast with all White actors would that have made it a better film for them. In the original 70's film there was a Black nurse and a White woman scientist. I'm sure that upset a lot of people too. Did any of these people know that in the original film they wanted to be politically correct too. They had a big debate over if they should cast a woman as a member of the Wildfire Team. When they did cast a woman in the part it was felt in order to make her more believable they should cast the most unattractive White woman they could find. They thought in the 70's no one would believe that a beautiful White woman would want to be a scientist or even have the brains to compete with all the White men.

My children have grown up with movies showing Blacks, Asians and Latino's in roles that I didn't see as a child. They see Blacks as Commanders of Star Ships and Space Stations. They see them as doctors and scientists and in many other leadership roles and a few blockbuster movies where Black men and White women have played Presidents of The United States. Asian and Latin children are seeing the same. This is normal to them and it is the right thing for film makers to do. Would our young people even tune in to watch this mini-series if they weren't represented in the Wildfire Team? The original was made before they were born and they may have never seen it. Watching programs such as these is what makes them dream of a better life for themselves and for our world.
9 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Danger Will Robinson!! Does not compute!!
jread-528 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Let's see: Some guys in the future have some kind of death organism that they discover can only be controlled by the bacteria that live near mineral-rich undersea vents. So they send a sample of the deadly stuff back in time to us, encased in a bucky-ball package that has instructions written on it in ASCII (not EBCDIC!) about how we shouldn't mine the vents and destroy the anti-virus bacteria. But some military types have a satellite hanging around the worm hole to the future hoping to snag some kind of schrecklichkeit from space they can use for germ warfare. Unfortunately, they snag the bucky-ball and break it open, destroying all the instructions except the name of the stuff and a serial number. The satellite crashes, loosing the virus. Meanwhile, evil big businessmen are preparing to mine the vents. So there are two simultaneous conspiracies, one to use the virus for warfare, the other to make sure the vents get mined. In the end: (1) scientists figure out how to use the vent-bacteria to kill the virus, thus saving the world for the moment; (2) the military conspirators kill each other because some of them have a change of heart; (3) the President decides to go ahead with the vent-mining anyway (4) a cigarette-smoking man saves a sample of the virus in the International Space Station so it will be available for the future.

So...

(1) Where did the virus come from in the first place? Did the Future get it from us, the Past? But in the Past (our Present) the vents get mined and there would be no bacteria for the Future to use to suppress the virus. So the Future could not be telling us how to combat the virus.

(2) Or, we are living in alternative past created when the Future sent the sample back to our universe. In the alternative Future created by our alternative Past, the Future will receive the sample from us, but they won't be able to control it and Time will end. But the real Future doesn't care, because they created an alternative Future (not theirs) that took the fall.

(3) But wait....

(4) And what about those highly favorable reviews posted here that were posted days and sometimes weeks BEFORE the date the show was aired? Are we living in an alternative universe in which the show is a turkey caused by the messages posted by people in the Past sending messages to the Present? If that singularity had not happened, would the show have been as great as they said it was?
50 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Typical Bad Gen Y Small Attention Span Remake
cvoci-12 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The original novel and 1971 movie worked because it was character driven, taught story. Unfortunately the new remake takes so many liberties and turns the whole thing into something else, something way overdone.

For those not familiar with the 1971 move, I suggest you watch it.

Let's compare and contrast: Cast - The original cast was well selected; each character was well defined (quickly) and were believable as scientists. Of special note was Kate Reid, who played Dr. Levitt to the hilt as a sarcastic, "speak your mind" genius. Arthur Hill played Dr. Stone with just the right amount of politics and authority without being over the top.

The new cast was just unbelievable, too "soap opera perfect". Everyone was too beautiful to be believable. The only exception was Rick Shroeder who did well. The rest of the cast was just too overwrought. Also, some of the characters are inappropriately missing or recast to fit a more Hollywood PC beautifulness.

Story - The original story rarely strays outside of Wildfire as the main focus is on the four scientists trying to come to a solution to the problem. The only time we are not in the lab was in the beginning when Stone and Hall go to the town for an up close look and to retrieve Scoop. Other shots included momentary scents of a jet fighter taking pictures of the town, a few scenes in Vandenberg etc. just to move the story along. Because a lot of the threat is implied the viewer is allowed to imagine the degree of horror, doom and destruction in their own mind - which would truly out do any graphic depictions.

the new version is all over the place and the consequences of the spread are magnified - taking away the ability of the viewer to let their mind run wild about what is going on. As I said, this is an unimaginative "in your face" kind of affair.

Special Effects - The original is certainly dated from a technological standpoint as it was made in 1971. Mainframe computers and Electron microscopes the size of bazookas are long gone, but all of this was in vogue and cutting edge at the time it was made. Also though the special effects and technology were very prominent, they are still merely props the characters used to move the story along, not the center of attention.

In the new movie, it is an onslaught of special effects. Everything is again overdone and so in your face that the sense of impending doom is stripped away. The body count is raised for sure and the degree of spread is raised exponentially. Though technologically impressive, the effects seem to be as much of the story as the characters, not a compliment to them.

All in all this unimaginative presentation disappoints and it is certainly way too long. Unlike the compact and tense original, this is nothing more than an overdone "re-imagining" (??) of a timeless gem of science fiction. Don't waste time on this mess
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth watching
potman-323 December 2008
It seems many of the reviewers for this movie have never seen a made-for-TV mini-series before. This movie may not have the huge explosions (there are minor explosions), the exceptional computer generated graphics (a little bit dodgy) and the first-rate acting (not bad - and you can play "which Sitcom is the actor from?"), but it has a interesting story that will keep you entertained. There are a few superfluous scenes that were obviously included to make the movie the required 3 hours, while also some bit-part characters seemed a little unnecessary, but generally it does not take away from the pace of the movie. If you like made-for-TV movies, and are not put off by a lower budget film and less than perfect acting, then this is a highly entertaining mini-series adaptation that is worth your time.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
New Generation
filmfan57221 May 2008
I think describing this film as the 'mini series event of the year' is over-hyping it a bit. Although it wasn't bad it wasn't that good but earns a solid 6 at least. I think fans of the original will be a bit put out as it largely tries to get away from it and be something entirely new on its own which doesn't have to be a bad thing. You can tell that the producers are trying to... almost modernise the whole aspect of the plot in an attempt to draw in a younger audience. Does this work? Maybe not but it's worth a look. Don't just ignore it. It's received pretty mixed reviews all round so its a love or hate thing. Only you can really decide. I wouldn't buy it on DVD but certainly watch it on television and see for yourself.
5 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Plan nine from outer-space was more credible than this!
denieuwehoorspelers21 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
36 years later, better CGI etc. so I had high hopes that this miniseries would be even better than the film from 1971. Unfortunately, it proved to be a big disappointment. The acting is bad, the CGI is worse and the story ...... Well, i guess a new word has to be invented to describe it properly. The original story, which had a big mysterious ring to it, has been altered for the worse. The story has been poisoned with paranoid idea's on the future, politics, governmental conspiracy's, conservation of the planet etc. etc. etc.. Flavoured with a little wormhole and spiced with a time paradox. And there you have it! A castrated remake of a superb film! This miniseries is worse than Plan nine from outer-space by far! I'm utterly disgusted with myself for having watched this ...... (truck-)load of horse excrement. Avoid this film, if you liked the '71 version!
69 out of 85 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This is as good as they come....
boggan321 April 2008
Just finished watching part one, and all i can say is that i cant wait to devour episode two. The acting is superb and they have spared no expenses, the settings and stages are top notch and the cgi is up there as well. Since I've only seen the first episode i cant really comment on the overall story since its only just starting to unfold and the overall feeling is that there's lots of things that has yet to happen. All i can say is: This has so far been very enjoyable, had this been released as a movie it still would have held me in its grasp, keep in mind that it would have been 3+ hours. If you are looking for some time to kill and really want to treat yourself, go with this one. Just don't do as i have done, wait until you can watch all the episodes back to back instead. Coz now i have to wait for the next one to air and i REALLY want to know what happens next... and there you have it. I rate it 8.8/10.
18 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Weaker Adaptation of a Sci-Fi Classic...Still Watchable
merdiolu14 June 2008
I have read original The Andromeda Strain novel when I was high school. For an juvenile male who tried to decide his future novel had a very serious effect on me. The characters , events and technologies even sci-fi elements were serious , all well explained and as reasonable as possible. By writing and publishing The Andromeda Strain at 1969 Michael Chricton had started techno thriller age in writing with realistic characters , non-dramatic , non stereotype and zero cliché plots and realistic , well explained techonologies and existing scientific knowledge&theories.

The Andromeda Strain movie made in 1971 was all time serious and again self explaining like the novel itself. Although there were some deviations from original novel it was not too jarring and disturbing to insult intelligence of audience...It was a complete adaptation to silver screen

Now we have The Andromeda Strain mini series. In fact I consider it as a production inspired from novel not an adaptation because there are several big differences between this mini series and novel itself. It is a watered down version of original novel. The writers considered updating the story to appeal seriously dumbed down TV audience (through technical jargon and dialogue is much closer to novel than 1971 movie) Ridley/Tony Scott production shows itself here and there and Mikhael Solomon is not a bad director. As for characters only Jeremy Stone as head medical expert of WILDFIRE stills exist in mini series and General Mancheck plays a more important part than novel itself. As for the mini what worked and what did not ?

-The beginning is exactly like original novel itself. In fact in my opinion better executed , -Entrance of WILDFIRE team to Pidemont was also very tense too ( like novel) -Unfortunetely when government conspiracy and stupid reporter Jack Nash story takes on downfall starts (these events were invented by scriptwriter and completely unrelated in the story of novel. I think they were just added to extend the story) -Updating other WILDFIRE team members (an Asian , a black and another character as gay ) is interesting -As story progresses other elements from OTHER Michael Chricton novels emerge (objects passed wormholes and went back through time , spread of Andromeda looked like a nanobot outbreak ) -Unnecessary romance subplot should have been dropped -Unlike the novel a solution and cure was found too easily...

So there are hits and misses in this new adaptation. If I were you I focus on positive points of this new Andromeda Strain version. It is not perfect and much weaker than original production but it is still easily watchable even for one time especially if you are tired of all awful third rate programming in TV. This movie gives some interesting challenges...
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Skip it, see the original
NavyOrion28 May 2008
Save yourself a few tedious hours, skip this crap and see the 1971 original. This is another example of a movie that has nothing going for it but the good feelings a viewer might have about the original. (How appropriate that I first saw a commercial for it while waiting for the lousy "Indiana Jones 4" to begin.)

So, so, so much padding! (And even so, A&E managed to stuff in almost 80 minutes of commercials in the two night run.) Ridiculous plot lines that go nowhere (the Geraldo-style reporter, "vent-mining"), unnecessary time-waster shots of animals eating each other (all just to establish the infection vector of a rat dropped onto a group of National Guardsmen) family squabbles that go nowhere... all of these had the unmistakable feel of an effort to reach a predetermined running time. The problem is, when length is more important a goal than quality, nothing can be left on the cutting-room floor. Trimmed to two hours, this just might have been a watchable movie.

Even if decently edited to tighten up the pacing, there's then the problem of reeediculous plot devices that were added to this adaptation. For example:

  • Telepathic germs (you gotta be freaking kidding)


  • Messages from the future (I wish I was freaking kidding) --- Note to you guys in the future: instead of the cryptic "739528", maybe "hey, look on the space station!" would get your point across a little better


  • Orbiting wormholes (still not kidding)


  • Blackbird attacks that kill soldiers in helmets and full combat gear (shades of Alfred Hitchcock)


  • Endless blather about "vent mining", and even a terrorist attack on a vent mining platform. ----- (Oops! did we forget to explain what that had to do with the story?)


  • "Pass the thumb"


  • Andromeda racing across the countryside turning everything yellow.


  • Dime-store CGI (we're talking "Sci-Fi Channel Original" quality) used even in scenes where the real thing would have been easier and more effective: flame throwers, dried blood sifting from a cut, the inexplicable falling debris in the core.


  • Is the action dragging? Time for some Guardsmen to buy the farm!


  • Hollywood leftist paranoia: the evil team of General Mancheck and Colonel Farris, military hit men, NSA stashing a final vial of the pathogen, and (my personal favorite) the company Enburton (Enron + Halliburton?) running the vent mining operation.


Michael Crichton wrote the original novel of "The Andromeda Strain", and the 1971 movie remembered so fondly by many was a quite faithful adaptation. You've heard of Michael Crichton because he has written lots of exciting and interesting science fiction, much of which has been turned into movies (of varying quality.)

This adaptation was written by Robert Schenkkan. You likely haven't heard of him, because he's been asked to write almost nothing else for the screen. Judging from this production, there would seem to be a reason for that. He has written a number of well-received plays, but apparently that talent does not translate well to television; what I recall of his 2004 "Spartacus" miniseries was on the level of "Andromeda". (Trekkie alert: as a C-list actor, Schenkkan is best remembered for eating an alien cockroach and then getting his head blown up, when he played Commander Remmick in the ST:TNG first-season episode "Conspiracy".)

If this is the best A&E can do, I hope that in the future they'll just stay out of the science fiction genre. At the very least they should produce original stories, instead of mucking up remakes of perfectly good predecessors.

I'll never get those four hours back, but you still have a chance to miss this movie. Consider yourself warned.
127 out of 164 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A much better than average TV thriller with a small budget
Robert_duder14 August 2008
I have not seen the original film nor have I read the book although I enjoy Michael Crighton but they advertised this enough to make me record it on TV and I'm glad I did because despite it's three plus hour length it is quite well done. Sadly it does still have some of the made for TV ingredients that happens to befall it but overall the strong writing and good story wins through. For being a TV film although a cable TV film there was plenty of violent and disturbing scenes necessary to make the movie work. I think with a different cast and bigger budget this could have been a very successful Hollywood film as it once was in the seventies. Still, for people who aren't familiar with the original movie or story as I was not then you will especially enjoy this as a new experience. Director Mikael Salomon is no stranger to film and Television. He has done some really brilliant work both as director and cinematographer and his talent shows. In fact I think part of what makes this film better than most TV movies is Salomon's talent. The cinematography in many cases for the movie is stunning and disturbing. The scientists making their way through a town street of dead, decaying bodies and it's shocking.

I don't dislike Benjamin Bratt, in fact I have really enjoyed some of his performances. Anyone that remembers the classic Stallone film Demolition Man will remember Bratt's small but very cheesy, straight faced performance as Alfredo Garcia and many of Bratt's lines delivered in this film reminded me of that cheesy performance. But overall he does a good job as leading man and he's pretty convincing as the leader of a group of biological scientists. Anyone missing Will and Grace will very much enjoy seeing Eric McCormack back in action as addict/reporter Jack Nash. I say this because the performance is Will, but hooked on drugs. Sure there is a little more action and they start establishing his addiction but never really go anywhere with it. Still he's good and fun to watch as an anti hero. I loved seeing Daniel Dae Kim (who Lost fans will immediately recognize) in a different role from Lost where he actually speaks English. Kim gives a subtle but very good performance as the very intelligent and straight laced scientist Dr. Tsi Chou who also is given an interesting back story without it ever really going anywhere. Viola Davis is very good as the family woman and scientist Dr. Charlene Barton. She doesn't get a chance to shine but she could have and shows some strong potential in the role. Christa Miller is mostly put in place to be a misplaced love interest for Bratt's character. She might be a good actor but she's given virtually nothing other than Bratt's lips. Rick Schroder gives perhaps one of the best performances but still under used as tough as nails Major Bill Keane. He really is great in the role and gives Bratt a good nemesis. Terrific character actor Andre Braugher does a good job playing a bit of a confusing character as far as walking the line between good and evil.

There is a lot of characters in the film and they really do try to give them depth and back stories and you can't blame them for that. It's only a slight downside because there is so much story and they don't get time to develop any of those sub stories because so much time has to be spent going after the main story which is the virus. Even still the story moves at a great pace and you never feel like it's dragging despite the fact that it could have been reduced. So much of the film takes place below the earth in their scientific compound but the thrill is still full force as they balance that out with scenes from the surface and the infected area and the Government trying to deal with it. Combine political thriller with science fiction disease and it makes for a very entertaining film that isn't perfect but certainly counts as one of the better more entertaining TV Movies I have seen in quite some time. 8/10
5 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Come on guys!
p_j_taylor20036 June 2008
After reading previous reviews, I expected to hate this with a passion. But I actually quite enjoyed it. I do in general despise TV films, especially American ones. But this came as a pleasant surprise. I have to say that I haven't seen the original. I can empathise with the other reviewers who have seen one of their favourites Hollywoodfied, I refuse to watch the new Wickerman for the same reason. But for anybody who hasn't seen the original....This isn't that bad. Sure it feels like a TV show, and some of the acting isn't brilliant, but I've seen a lot worse. I thought the president was very good. This is worthwhile if you're bored, but don't run out and buy a copy!
3 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Poor Remake - Deus Ex Machinas Unite!
ozbear29 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
While lifting various plot elements from the original (nasty virus, Wildfire containment facility, odd-man-out auto-destruct canceler, etc) we get a whole pile of additional elements thrown in, and for no apparent good reason.

Ben Bratt's character has a substance abusing wife and an estranged son...this goes no where.

The Wildfire team is now composed of a more politically correct team including a black, an Asian, and a homosexual.

Wormhole? Virus sent from the future so we can save ourselves? Somebody's been watching too many Star Trek reruns.

The let's-crawl-up-the-central-Wildfire-tube-core sequence in the original was terrific and tension filled. In this remake it is labored and boring. It might have gained another score point if the wrong thumb had been cut off.

And then there's Jack Nash running around looking for Grace (oops, wrong series).

And then we have all the secret bad government daring-do, a predictable addition in these times.

As someone else once said "They should only remake bad movies".

You've been warned.
89 out of 113 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed