22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Freaks (2018)
7/10
Must see for genre fans
19 November 2023
This movie is a great achievement, given it's budget, and ambitions.

Because yes, it's ambitious. Bites a little more than it can chew, but hey, that's what indie sci-fi is all about.

Mr Hirsh sure delivers the goods. As does Mr Dern. Many excellent performances. And Lexy Kolker really succeeds at the challenge of holding the whole movie by herself.

Set design, camera work, lighting, sound and the score even, the job done is sub par.

But what with the make-up department? Hirsh looks like Jack Black all the way through, you'll get over it, but the poor Kolker looks like she just walked out the stage of a pre-teen beauty pageant.

I didn't notice any script errors, I was just mesmerized by what her lip gloss and mascara would evolve into from one scene to another.

Honestly, it would have made more sense if she had been running after a Sephora truck rather than craving for ice cream.

Many critics complain about the predictability of the plot, and how it's been done before.. To that I don't agree. Sure, they didn't "start the fire", but there is a lot of creativity in there.

With low budget and ambitions, as tempting as it must be maybe they shouldn't have lurked that much into early James Cameron territory, towards the end, because it bites...

...of course, I meant about Lexy Kolker's make-up.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Netflix crysploitatiion at its worst
29 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
No soul in there. I feel sorry for the lady's demise of course, but the shows sole purpose is exploitation it. I don't see any service to her memory.

Some people might learn that figure skaters are exploited and milked money out of, and for these people, I am really glad they learned something out of it.

I am angry that I got pulled into watching this. It's not a competition about the worst fate, but... The Trials of Gabriel Fernandez is something I learned from.

This is not crime drama this is just... Drama. This is like, "ain't it some other news item I can draw money from?"

Take your chance.
2 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Platform (2019)
5/10
So... What?
7 August 2023
I really don't understand the hype that movie got.

The premise is just plain stupid. Right from the start you can guess that "a lot of questions will be left unanswered". But the only reason for this, is they would have had a hard time trying to put any sense into this mess.

The only reason for this movie to exist, is a desperate attempt to copy Natali's Cube (1997) concept.

Not the "eerie, mysterious, engaging, enigmatic" side of Cube's concept (they probably assumed that it would simply come with the territory - No, they were only interested in the "let's save money with a single stage shooting" concept. Clever.

With a dystopian, ugly-social-class-disparity sort of background, the package would be an easy sell. To, like, make you think. But don't go pushing the tinking any further : they didn't bother to, neither should you.

You are left with run-of-the-mill character building mechanics, more stupidity, waiting for obvious plot devices to show up, trying to care for the kid, more stupidity, checking your watch to make sure the next "shock scene" appears in a timely manner, and, if you paid to see this, trying to be excited about the ending.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel: Typos and Torsos (2023)
Season 5, Episode 3
10/10
Overall quality is high, but...
18 April 2023
On that particular episode, the direction and choreography skills border on insanity. I am sure that several apparently mundane scenes over the series required as much work, if not more, than the spectacular demonstrations displayed here ; but nothing can justify the amount of craft and effort, and, yes, money, involved in the making of this show.

Or maybe it's for the sake of art.

And talking about insane talent, there again, the production puts Mr Shalhoub's abilities to stress, and gratifying results.

Makes you realize how talented the whole cast is, not looking even slightly pale nor weak against his performance.

Of course, the brilliant dialogue helps. They sure all have a blast with the material. And so do I.
14 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quirky and fun. Won my heart over.
20 June 2022
I'll make a plus/minus review, for a change :

PLUS + by-the-book script writing. Always good in B-horror guilty pleasures IMO. Sketchy char building, plot devices line up, forces in place for motion, atmospheric setup and here we go. Doesn't mean it's not inventive, of course.

+ Nic as a mute. A dream come true! I respect Mr Cage a lot as an actor, mind you. You gotta love it when A-list actors embrace low-profile genre projects; like he had done with Mom & Dad, or Reynolds with The Voices, or Johansson with Under The Skin.

+ not as repetitive and stale as some reviews could lead you to believe. There are some twists and turns.

+ diligent set design. Given the budget and time limitations that this production must have had, I found the care put in that field to be quite noteworthy.

+ ridiculous fight scenes, yet not overlong, keeping the movie at pace. Just little nuggets of fun every now and then.

+ score works fine. Hitting a few high spots along the way.

+ thankfully, a lot less CGI than I expected.

+ pinball porn.

MINUS
  • Regrettably, the little CGI there is is absolutely awful. Animatronics are so much scarier than over-animated, cartoonish, shape-shifting computer processes with little concern for ambient lighting.


  • shameless Five Nights At Freddy's rip-off, despite their claims. Of course it is. I don't know how they got away from a lawsuit, especially since WB bought the films rights of the franchise years ago.


  • some fine performances, making the bad ones look so much worse. Having Beth Grant (sheriff) and David Sheftell (deputy) in the same room, and talking, is a bad idea.


  • excessive ugliness of the animatronics' design. They're meant to look scary, far too much. Much like the doll in the Annabelle movies, who would craft or buy a doll looking like this?! Chucky was kinda cute out of the box!


CONCLUSION 7 may be too high of a mark, but this flick makes so many things right, it's hard not to like. It is good-natured, hardworking, cartwheeling out of its way to try and make you have some silly fun.

It won my heart over.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Terrific sound. Interesting direction. Little else.
18 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Eerie atmosphere right from the start, sharp direction and editing, the mood is heavy, oppressive. You're invited to delve into an intriguing mystery in the most immersive way.

Contributing to the unsettling sound design, the actors are voiced over, a little off key, and oh-so-slightly out of sync. And the scarce dialogue also is somewhat weird.

Okay now snap out of it. Let's solve that mystery for you : in fact the acting is just bad, the script is just awful, and the story is as unsurprising and trivial it gets - disappointingly so, I mean, all these.bells and whistles for this ?

Don't get me wrong of course it's awful and dramatic, of course it's awful and dramatic to abduct and use children for this - oh sorry, I just spoiled THE WHOLE PLOT by saying nothing. Yep, you have just guessed THE WHOLE PLOT, congratulations.

It would have helped if some absolutely ludicrous story elements had been avoided.

Like, for example, let's say you're chasing a kid around a house with a loaded gun. Let's say the kid is utterly stupid, yet a wiz at close up magic, so he.handcuffs you to some pipe. What would you do with your full round of ammo ? Everything but freeing yourself of course.

It would have helped if it had more than a couple of decent ideas to fill the running time. How do you fill the running time then?

Let's say... the.aggressor runs after the KID with an AXE. The kid hides in the BATHROOM, and the aggressor tries to BREAK through THE DOOR with the AXE. While the kids stands in horror AGAINST THE DOOR FRAME INSIDE.

Wait, there's more. Let's say a SAVIOR EX MACHINA enters the house out of a STRONG HUNCH that something is going wrong in there. Let's say that after a handful of SECONDS inside he gets STABBED IN THE BACK with the AXE.

Yes, I typed in bold in case it wasn't obvious enough. And it's everything but an homage, even Ready Player One was more an homage than this.

Who greenlights such a weak pile of scenario? How comes this thing is so praised on RT, second best reviewed horror movie of 2021?!

Yet I don't think it deserves anything less than a 6/10, as the cinematography is really good, the editing precise, and the sound direction is remarkable, excellent even, most of the time. To my taste.

Edit : reading some other users reviews, I realize I forgot about the ridiculously massive and highlighted and showcased MAGA bumper sticker on the bad guys' car. How stupid can you be to feel clever about pulling out something like that? They heard about "social/political messages" in horror movies and that's the best they could do? Hammered, puerile proselytism has nothing to do with social commentary. Talk about scoring an own goal.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Hostel" written by Mary Higgins Clark
3 November 2020
I'm not a big fan of MHG, but I've read a few of her books, but I am sure she was an influence in the writing here.

The tense buildup, the character development, the long climax with an intense feeling of real time emergency on several perspectives ; the pacing, the acting, the photography, the camera work are spot on on so many levels.

Moon-jo is one of the creepiest villains ever caught on film (and casting Dong Wook-Lee, a model more famous for his heartthrob roles in teenage girls-dramas, was genius), and actress Jeong-eun Lee (of "Parasite" fame) as the housekeeper delivers gold.

Watching this gem you are in for an intriguing, chilling, thrilling ride.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fine épisode, but...
27 October 2020
Why the black and white? The whole episode is set in mid-17th century, but why the B&W? Oh I get it, back then they didn't have the technology to film in color, and in the 17th century their TV sets were probably all in b&w anyway.

The whole series is a huge, often confusing mix of flashbacks, reveries, fantasies, possessions - they even have a word for the inclusion of one of these into any other, "dream hopping" - so there in this very much linear episode, with lavish period costumes, constant narration and a whole different cast, we certainly didn't need the B&W to be reminded that all this happened centuries ago.

Plus, as always, HD digital b&w looks disgusting.

No, the B&W move was as manipulative as it was ludicrous.

Reminded me of the series Rome which I couldn't watch, as it annoyed me so much that all actors spoke Shakespeare-era English to, ya know, "sound old"
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bates Motel (2013–2017)
9/10
A gem in the dark
26 October 2020
Of course this show has had plenty of audience and good word of mouth, and still enjoys a good run on Netflix and al., yet it doesn't get the recognition it is worth of, in my opinion. It barely won any awards.

In the shadow of the fading Dexter, the exquisite Fargo, many other great series, and of course, the monumental shadow cast by its own source material.

I'm so glad I finally gave it a chance.

It isn't perfect, there are a few flaws there and there, but I guarantee it will take you to places you would never have expected.

The cast is great, Farmiga is of course up to the challenge, but they put the bucks on Highmore, and oh boy does he deliver. The guy is just pure clay in the hands of the writing and direction. Anytime, whatever you feel towards his character is what he has been told to make you.

Some say the first seasons are weaker than the latter, but I disagree, the "Twin Peaks" feel of the beginnings is what got me caught in. It evolves along the way.

I keep this one in my favorites nested between Six Feet Under and... Growing Pains, for some reason (wtf?)
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Before I Wake (2016)
5/10
Give it a chance.
7 August 2020
I really enjoy Mr Flanagan's work, I was really surprised he had directed this. I was surprised a native English speaker had directed this.

I think the acting wasn't that bad. The problem with this movie is everything. Light, makeup, hairdressing, photography, dialogue, everything makes the cast look like CGI. Yet, the CGI stands awful.

The real horror in this movie is the lack of sensibility and depth involved in the treatment of the difficult subjects it tries to handle.

The movie has to suffer the unfair comparison to the genuinely creepy work of art that is Babadook, addressing similar matters but with more soul than you probably would have wished the movie to have.

Yet... Give it a chance. Watch it. There is a hand, turning the knob, on the other side of the door.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Terror (2018–2025)
4/10
(spoilers) Season 1 : Not impressed.
14 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Yes, the actors are doing a great job in this. They had a clever concept for the casting process : what about hiring fine, classically trained British stage actors, making them wear 19th century military outfits and deliver lines emphatically. Success !

Great photography. Then again, boat in the middle of nowhere, barely lit narrow indoors, great outdoors of nothing for the last episodes - expertly done, yet formulaic. Comes in a package with spare batteries.

Passable direction, from beginning to end. Just bland. Then again, it fits the material. I'm not saying that because of the dreadfully dull scenario, no, the direction gives pride of place to the intensely theatrical, dramatically concerned performances.

In this review I will be talking about a handful of noticeable moments occurring in the ten ninety minute long episodes of the first season. As a result, I will reveal every single plot element of the story : spoiler warning.

Ready? This ain't no horror show in so many ways.

Why has the book been made (which I haven't read) and the series picked up? Because one of the two boats involved in the actual, historical expedition, was indeed called "TERROR". What a weird name for a boat, and a great opportunity to generate some intriguing spooky fantasy-oriented entertainment.

And who cares about missing all marks by miles, or even trying to hit any, this will be a success just because of the intriguing yet accurate title, the stylish production pretentions, and quite importantly, the HUMANE factors.

Two humane factors, both very convenient, the first being the free disposal of historical figures nobody will defend the memory of, and the second one the availability of mysterious and mystical natives that will fuel any random crap you can think of.

As luck would have it, the poor departed even had funny names to make use of, such as Lt Goodsir (being a nice guy) and Mr Hickey (it's irish, pronounce "Icky").

But then, you need some horror elements. To make horror. That's what they settled on, given the name of one of the ships.

Horror here consists of : mutilation, an autopsy, self mutilation, gastric mishaps and mundane cannibalism. But wait, there is also a metaphorical beast roaming around! A big white bear of sorts, with sheep's eyes, weighting like two or three tons, with two feet long claws, yet trapeze artist extraordinaire.

Soon into the intrigue, you will probably realize that the beast isn't an actual animal. Acute viewers will quickly understand that it is, in fact, clever computer generated imagery - and a groundbreaking achievement all the same, as it is probably the less scary, less interesting, less suspenseful computer process ever created. I have been more frightened by the flying toasters I had for a screensaver back in the 90s.

I was threatening of revealing major plot elements, so here they are. A dying man sees a chubby native telling him they'd better leave the area (a nice initiative, but as the guy dies seconds later, pretty useless) then repeats the same thing with a funny mask on, for motivational purposes probably, alas, that was still ineffective, irrelevant, and pointless. And barely climatic.

A man at sea dies.

A man goes underwater to poke the ice out one of the sailboat's propeller (hey, don't get angry at me, I'm just reporting, you know) and has the dead at sea guy floating eerily towards him. in a spine chilling sequence. Yanks his rope twice to be pulled out of the water, gets pulled out of the water, nothing happens. Yet we learn that he's good at smashing humongous blocks of metaphorical ice with a stick.

The commandant dies. Thanks to glamour eyes bear. Nothing interesting ensues.

One crew member refuses to carry a corpse down the hold of the ship, where they keep the corpses. Because.... He heard the corpses talking to him! And others have too, he claims! His superior gets angry at him and menaces him but then a good sir shows up (Lt Goodsir), gives the guy a lantern, and the corpse is disposed in the hold of the ship, and it's done, no corpse ever talks, ever, nothing happens, and that's it. They don't go for cheap thrills. They go for no thrills at all.

The cook is confronted to the unsavory, unhealthy state of the food cans. Cook answers "Add more salt! Hahaha!"

As food resources anxiety arises, a monkey in blue shorts eats from a can, veal ribs in tomato sauce, during several minutes. Thanks to one of the flashbacks, we learn that in fact, the ape is a female. Character development via flashbacks is a trademark of the series, mostly to even lesser informative content. Monkey stays healthy.

Guy taking command in replacement of the commandant who died in a tragically laughable scene involving the daunting eyed bear-shaped computer process. Lengthy dialog had explained earlier how unpopular the man was with his fellow officers, but surprisingly, none of this matters in future developments.

New commandant gets terminally ill, probably due to food poisoning. Two episodes later he is completely cured, and ready to go. Which is nice.

An unruly sailor gets sentenced to flagellation "as a boy", meaning he will be whipped publicly on his bare ass. Another major event. No, really, the title of the episode is "punished as a boy". Most of the major events I covered here had their episode titled after them.

An impromptu carnival party is held. Order of the new commandant. The crew does a nice job setting it up. Some lucky guy had packed a full body, metallic, antique Roman soldier costume, as it would come in handy in case that kind of festivity were to happen. Boy was he right.

People are cold when they go on a march to run some errands, not that there is much to do in the vicinity anyway, so they come back a few hours later, being quite cold. The ones who feel like staying aboard don't suffer much of the cold, they have thick coats indeed, but scarves nor gloves were in fashion back then.

As episodes drag on, extreme cold becomes less and less of a concern. In the last one, they strike scenic musical-like ensemble poses in period underwear, but the fun stops as heavily rendered doe eyed plot device shows up, maiming some, and then brutally, suddenly dying of, you have guessed it right, indigestion.

All over, the score deserves some credit. I had to find something to care about.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Her Story (2015 Video Game)
10/10
Put a toe in it then dive
4 September 2019
You log on a police database, storing video recordings of interrogations. You're only given access to one "cold" case, and a single person's testimonials, "Hers". It's "Her Story", cut in very short clips, classified by tags, and you browse them via a search engine.

Will you find answers to this mistery. Is it answers you should be looking for. Why not digging in some side story just out of curiosity. What does she have to say about that. What does she say. What doesn't she say.

This game is not very long to get through, like a movie I'd say, but it really is a journey of its own. Have a piece of paper and a pen at hand. Let that... thing perform its spell, and let's hope it works on you.

A steal on Steam, and great indie efforts such as this one deserves all the support in my book. And of course, kudos to Viva Seifert, who is hauntingly convincing in this peculiar acting exercise.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's exploitation.
3 February 2019
What can you expect from a movie titled like this.

Exactly what you get. And then some.

A valuable addition to the genre. Respectful to it, tastefully tasteless, brilliantly bland, blandly brillant.

Yet there's something disturbingly wrong about it though.

It's exploitation.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Clown (2014)
2/10
Awful in every way
12 May 2018
I have a weakness for Roth-related material. He's an easy target for most, who usually haven't seen much of his work if any, so for the many times he surprised me the right way, I tend to be attentive and overlook the flaws.

Overlook this whole movie. It doesn't even try to have an "oldie 80's look", it just takes every trick in the book. Jump scares are lame, the orchestra hits will often get you to understand you were supposed to be scared a second ago. The score is AWFUL. Barely daytime TV movie level.

The acting is terrible. Sure they're not helped by the scooped in dialogue, which managed to steal a few smiles from me as I wondered which awful truism would come out of the next open mouth. And as most of the action is as predictable as your average informercial, oh they do walk the walk and talk the talk.

The clown, is, well, a clown. No real effort is made, for example when he tries to take off his wig and fake nose, the scene is one of the most ridiculous that comes to mind. Worse, it feels like the guy thinks he's smart and clever grimacing his way through it. Yet any slap scene from any soap drama the world over has more convincing violence than that.

As I'm a jerk, I'll go on with the wife, a breeze of vapor, I wonder how many takes were necessary for her "My husband would never do anything like that" delivery, wich had me rewinding and replay several times over to be believed, and all the scenes poor Stormare desperately tries to get a pulse from her, and desperately tries to get done with his stupid, convoluted explainatory text. I hope Stormare got away with most of the budget with his Christopher Lloyd impression, he deserved it.

And the kid. Oh the kid. I could bet that the scene of his first main appearance, where he's just sitting at the kitchen table, took serveral takes as he kept sending stares at the camera. I don't know if it was the case but it really felt that way. Most of his lines are dubbed as his facing away or backlit.

The action, the gore? Nothing but bloody prothesis of little kids limbs! Yeah! How's that for fun? It fills the running time, with stupid kids running around the clown until quick snacking scenes are suggested.

Any attempt of cleverness in direction is ill thought and awfully done. The very few decent scenes towards the end, you have seen the exact same ones in older, better movies.

A waste of time. For children maiming afficionados only. And people who feel wise at guessing stuff.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
What is it with all the blah blah in there ? I should join in !
3 October 2016
There's a thing when you get older, you can shut up kids.

Timeless classic I was born then, saw it, the original, and walked home without bothering anyone about the timeless wonder I'd just witnessed. Although the special effect were very, very impressive at the time.

In fact I didn't see it in a theater back then, I was too busy saving money to buy the sneakers Ray Parker Jr. wore in the music video, and I also wanted the neon bedside lamp but it was out of my league, finally I got it on Christmas but it is not the point there.

OK the "reboot" isn't very great. I had fun anyway. As in Feig's previous movies, the written oneliners and jokes fall flat, but thanks to a great cast the improv included in the final cut saves the day. Don't serve me the "that kind of production is so planned, there's none of that": it's blatant.

Which brings me to Hemsworth... yeah, he's funny in this. But me too can play a houseplant and be funny in this. And I've nothing against the guy I think he's a fairly good actor.

The thing that really annoyed me was Hemworth's momentum (yeah, everybody gets one, large cast, plenty of meals to serve, some egos in the way maybe, or agents, well, everybody gets its five minute of brilliance) was a direct and complete rehash of a very famous scene from The Mask.

They not only pulled that off, but even brought back the scene, on repeat, to animate the first half of the end credits. So proud. So much fun. Hemsworth is actually required to say this, you can distinctively hear him say "so much fun" during the process.

The other half of the end credits is about special effects and prop design auto-satisfaction.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A brilliantly crafted piece of cinema
3 October 2016
I don't often give a ten, but this time here goes my vote.

I didn't rush to see this one because I didn't care much about the first Conjuring. It is lost somewhere in my memory between Insidious and some other movie I forgot about. The design of the Anabelle doll bothered me to begin with.

Anyway, I finally watched The Conjuring 2, driven by favorable critics and word of mouth, and I am really glad I did.

Of course it's a James Wan ghost movie, so they throw everything in but the kitchen sink, although I think the kitchen sink got thrown out at some point, but I loved every part of the ride.

The Warren couple works in this one. There is real chemistry. The kids are all great. A kid in a horror movie is usually a low point, useful to generate compassion but also to make the rest of the cast look good, but there you have three of them, who seem to effortlessly deliver, well, anything. They performed so well I almost didn't notice.

The efficient reenactment of the 70's period is a real pleasure, but the movie doesn't just rely on the tricks (and bells, and whistles) of that proficient era. I really think they tried to sponge out ideas and mood from recent horror greats. I felt some Babadook in there. And a hint of It Follows maybe.

Clearly the creative department (because there is plenty of creativity nonetheless) tried hard on this, which is great, because they didn't have to. They would have made their money anyway.

Thank you Mr Wan. Very hard.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Good thing the action starts before the end credits
29 September 2016
Character buildup. For most of the movie. Too bad they are so two dimensional it hurts, some drastic change of behavior is supposed to be intriguing when it's just a welcomed announcement that things are actually moving towards the ending, which is obvious right from the start.

Don't miss the blatant, obnoxious plot device near the middle, or you might actually get surprised by some detail at the end. The Hand That Rocks The Cradle even had that more subtly, in addition with a decently paced script. Which is another crappy movie, but fairly entertaining for its time.

Acting isn't bad, until daddy throws his fit, but the plot is bad, predictable, and dare I say, unimaginative. A TV movie from the 80's.
23 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Buried (2010)
8/10
Compelling, brilliant.
14 September 2010
I thought this movie would either have its last half and climax in a box, or be chockful with flashbacks and subplots, but nope. Just a guy in a box for the whole length of the movie.

Yet, what a ride. I can't believe the nerve of the screenplay writer, sitting at his desk with such a goal. But he got the job done for sure. Lifting the gimmicky premise to surprising levels.

Yes there are a (very) few scenes that weren't that necessary, still you stand at the edge of your seat waiting for what will happen next, and if not all occurrences are equal in thrills and revelations, it all blends in a terrific experience.

I really don't care for people saying the lighter should have burned most of the available oxygen, or that the cell phone shouldn't get any reception. Given the plot those concerns are stupid.

A few words about the man of the hour, Ryan Reynolds gives an excellent performance here indeed, but (how to put that right?) it didn't seem like a very hard role to pull off. Maybe I'm wrong, and he pulled that off effortlessly. Anyway dumb me thought he was just a pretty face romcom actor but I learned that he enjoyed playing parts in many indies that I missed and will try to check out.

The ending may or may not satisfy you, anyway like in most good movies, and often in life, the journey is more interesting than the destination.
18 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Offensive in every way
10 March 2010
How could anybody raise any money for this. Marketed as a Harry Potter/Jeunet ripoff, that piece of garbage goes out of its way to steal from any source of successful and/or creative popular material, only doing it wrong in an unimaginative, exploitative attempt to cash on people's (and especially children's) stupidity.

Nobody is spared, Grinn, J.K.Rowling, Del Toro, Burton, S.King, W.Golding... and a copious amount of French references, with Goscigny and Jeunet being the most obvious.

Modern and politically correct winks are included of course, the single cool and integrated black kid shows up when needed, pop culture references, and so on.

Any attempt at originality is ill-advised, if not completely, utterly sick.

CGI is everywhere it shouldn't be. Many visuals are good, but many times unnecessary CGI elements are shouting "look at me ! I'm a process" on the screen. Like a phony print on a building, things like that.

Needless to say, any decent performance (by the kids) gets drowned with the boat.

The whole mess feels like a cheap, unlicensed, toxic copy of a plastic smurf village set.
12 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A lot of fun
10 January 2010
Marcello (Mastroianni) is the tenth victim. Caroline (Ursulla Andress), an American woman, hunts him down, and tries to attract him in a trap ("I came to Rome to conduct an inquiry on the sexual conduct of Italian men"), but he doesn't trust her, so she insists ("Look, I represent millions of unsatisfied American women!"). This film a real slice of the sixties, and an unsung reference of Austin Powers - a few minutes into the movie will convince you of that.

Design from the future all over the place, the usual garish yet drab colours, improbable main theme, trendy symbolism : who cares about everybody shooting at each other, the important things here are that Ms Andress has to look her best, that Marcello has to be the perfect Italian taciturn macho stereotype ("Telling the truth? Nobody likes the truth. I blush when I tell the truth") and that the last 15 minutes have to make no sense whatsoever.

A pop-artsy excuse for an Italian romp, served with lightness and hearty fun. Don't expect "Le Prix Du Danger" here !
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Crank (2006)
10/10
It's not a DVD, it's a molotov cocktail
20 September 2009
I hate reviews that start with a nth synopsis. But here goes: The guy wakes up at the beginning, and watches a video where he learns that if his heartbeat rate goes too low, he'll die.

Well, it's pretty much WYSIWYG from then on.

Some people might miss this title, thinking it's basically "Speed" with a guy playing the role of the bus. Well they shouldn't, because there is a lot more in there. Yes, there are a lot more movies referenced. But the film makers are proud of their references, and they give them a royal treatment.

How they managed to include splotches of humor, and genuine cinematographic art in such a ride is a mystery for me. I thought I was in for another one of Besson's "Transporter" kind of fluff, but how wrong I was.

And on top of it all Statham's charisma literally drips off the screen! I can't wait to see the sequel.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rampage (2009)
8/10
Is it because I expected so little that I found this movie so great?
6 September 2009
The only movie I had seen from Boll was House Of The Dead. It was a lot of fun because it was so bad. I read reviews of other movies he made, and I suspect they weren't much better. I was infuriated with what he did with the Alone In The Dark franchise, with guns and bimbo scientist and all.

I went to see Rampage (at the L'Etrange Festival) with a smirk on my face. I missed the 15 first minutes and I'm almost glad I did: the lousy messages, the jump cuts, the ad lib dialogue were about to get me out of here. But the actors weren't bad, things kept moving, so I played along.

Then started the said "rampage". There is not much to tell about it. It feels like Boll wanted to stick the nose of GTA players into their own *bip*, asking "So you thinks that's funny? See what it's like, is that so much fun anymore?" The movie gets better every minute. By the end of it I also wondered if the beginning was playing on the fact that we expect something stupid, illogical and aimless from his movies.

The logic is not without faults, but nothing that couldn't be discussed, the humour is great, scarce and surprisingly witty, overall, for me it was a success. If you get a chance to watch it, stick with it, at the end you might find yourself surprised at how it got there, from where it started.

As a side comment I would like to add that Mr Boll is a very nice person, on the first day of the festival he stood in the middle of the multiplex for hours (without boxing gloves) just to talk with people. I'm familiar with festivals and you don't see a lot of directors doing that.
138 out of 183 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed