Drags out the same info over and over the first two episodes, then dumps all kinds of heavyweight evidence in the third.
The first two I was somewhat on the fence on his innocence/guilt, but the 3rd exposes so much that should have been revealed earlier. As an example, sexual assaults and witness thereof.
There's multitudes of evidence that suggests early exposure to deviant sexual behavior can lead to a lifetime of maladjusted behavior and often leads to committing their own sexual violence at some point. Lots of evidence that he was behaving in this manner at a ridiculously early age and given that his son has his own issues, I'd say he was likely abused by someone at some point in his own childhood, or came to it by way of proxy to his fathers crime(s).
I would tend to agree with his new attorney that committing this heinous crime alone seems highly unlikely, however, I believe he was in some way involved all along.
I don't disagree that the police initially handling the case were incredibly unscrupulous and heavy-handed, but were acting within legalities at the time. Perhaps some evidence was forced and the confession could have been, but there's just so much evidence to suggest this man is guilty.
It happens often- people forget these now elderly criminals who are now feeble, soft and sympathetic were once very strong, dangerous and violent.
The first two I was somewhat on the fence on his innocence/guilt, but the 3rd exposes so much that should have been revealed earlier. As an example, sexual assaults and witness thereof.
There's multitudes of evidence that suggests early exposure to deviant sexual behavior can lead to a lifetime of maladjusted behavior and often leads to committing their own sexual violence at some point. Lots of evidence that he was behaving in this manner at a ridiculously early age and given that his son has his own issues, I'd say he was likely abused by someone at some point in his own childhood, or came to it by way of proxy to his fathers crime(s).
I would tend to agree with his new attorney that committing this heinous crime alone seems highly unlikely, however, I believe he was in some way involved all along.
I don't disagree that the police initially handling the case were incredibly unscrupulous and heavy-handed, but were acting within legalities at the time. Perhaps some evidence was forced and the confession could have been, but there's just so much evidence to suggest this man is guilty.
It happens often- people forget these now elderly criminals who are now feeble, soft and sympathetic were once very strong, dangerous and violent.