Dracula: The Blonde Pathetic
20 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Pathetic! What a mess! Irritating and painful to watch.

As silly as Francis Coppola's Bram Stoker's Dracula.

Even Uwe Boll's Bloodrayne 1 & 2 are better than this.

Where to begin? The plot is so boring that it's tough to get through the very first 3 minutes. This largely clichéd opening even attempts to imitate Francis Coppola's unworthy work.

A century later...

The retarded minions jump like spider monkeys.

Surprise! The little thief leader wields this ugly-ass piece of wood they call "lightbringer", the ultimate weapon that will kick Dracula's ass.

Thus comes the first crusade of Dracula by a bunch of losers.

The whole thing is laughable.

It won't help even if the audience is willing to give this crap a chance.

It simply doesn't have anything intriguing to offer.

......

The only few decent things about this film include the light music used during the scene of romance, the costume, the set designs, and a few good lines ("God has the power to create life. I prevent Him from taking life away.").

Pathetic! If only all those advantages, all the effort of making this unworthy crap could be used for creating a decent film about Vlad the Impaler!
6 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed