Review of Dark Fields

Dark Fields (2009)
5/10
One redeeming quality--only one
16 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Passable to waste time. I was sick, so have an excuse for sitting through the whole film.

This film's premise is a promising one, but as other reviewers have noted, the promise isn't paid off, in part due to poor script and worse acting at times.

However, being always the optimist, I did find one redeeming quality. And herein lie the spoilers: The heroine character ultimately opts to save her brother over saving her parents or other relatives. As a student of evolutionary altruism, this is one of the few films to get it right--though I seriously doubt anyone involved actually thought of this.

IF there is such a thing as innate altruism, it would tie strongly to the preservation of shared genes. And because, in reality, the sister and brother share more genes than either one shares with their parents, it makes more sense from an evolutionary viewpoint for her to sacrifice herself for a brother than to sacrifice her brother for her parents.

Especially since brothers are much more likely, biologically, to spread their genes than any female is. It's simply biology at work.

So there you have it. The one and only redeeming quality of this otherwise useless film. Too bad. The premise, with 3 different times periods involved, could have been done so well as to make an outstanding suspense. Alas, that was not to be.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed