"The Moth Diaries", based on the book by Rachel Klein, tells the story of a sixteen-year-old girl who is returning to boarding school for the year at Brangwyn, a secluded girl's school that was once a grand hotel in its heyday. The girl is Rebecca (Sarah Bolger), and she's still dealing with the trauma of losing her poet father to suicide, so she seems to invest all of her time and emotion into her friendship with fellow student Lucie (Sarah Gadon). It's a new year, Rebecca has her circle of friends, there's a hot new English teacher at school (Scott Speedman), and by all accounts, it seems like it's going to be a great year for her. That is, until Ernessa (Lily Cole) arrives at the school. Tall, dark-haired, and mysteriously brooding, Ernessa seems to have a secret. And when she and Lucie become too close for Rebecca's comfort, she goes a bit mad. Is Rebecca overreacting, or does Ernessa have ulterior motives?
I'm going to be frank here; with Mary Harron (the woman behind "The Notorious Bettie Page" and "American Psycho") penning the screenplay for this and directing it, I expected more and got less. I'll begin by telling you what's wrong with this movie and then end my review on a more positive note with what was done well. The biggest problem with this film is, almost fatally, its overall plot structure. Harron's script is terribly choppy, and the transitions in the film are wooden and seem like filler material. Since the film is based on a book that was written in journal form, Harron opted to use internal dialogue and asides from the Rebecca character, drawn out of her diaries. The problem this creates is that her placement of these asides and "thoughts" as they may be come across as inappropriate and almost cheapen the film to Lifetime status. The poor transitions here kill the plot momentum and also eliminate suspense, which a film like this needs in order to gain investment from its audience.
Secondly, there is the dialogue. It's stiff, boring, and completely uninspired, ala a made-for-TV B-movie. Acting-wise, we've got performances all over the spectrum. Sarah Bolger is competent as our obsessive leading lady, and Sarah Gadon is decent as her object of obsession, but neither are particularly impressive. The incredibly good-looking Scott Speedman is awkward as the English professor whose oh-so-convenient literary insight provides the film's classic vampire arcs, but I think his on screen stiffness is more a fault of the script than his acting ability. The other girls in the film are, well... pretty bad. That's all I'm going to say. So, this brings us to Lily Cole, who plays our vampy new girl; simply put, Cole outshines everybody here. Although her role is nothing new in the horror/vampire genre, her embodiment of this classic character was flawless. She plays up the brooding aspects without becoming hammy, and at times comes across as charming and sweet— just like a vampire. Physically speaking, she's intimidating on screen; the camera-work accentuates her height, and her raven hair and doll-like face add to her character's overall eeriness. In short, she's really, really great in this.
In addition to Cole's performance, I also really enjoyed the visual aspects of the film. Where Harron has failed her script, she's succeeded as a visualist. Her work on "American Psycho" displayed her talent for imagery, and she does a great job in that department here. The Gothic overtones and the atmosphere of the school take center stage through the cinematography, and there are several sequences that do impress- the raining blood scene in the school library is the standout scene in the film; visually disturbing as well as thematically relevant.
I'd also like to point out the very obvious allusions that the film makes, the biggest one being to Carmilla, the classic precursor to the vampire novel, and an inspiration for countless horror films. There are parallels to Dracula as well, and the film stays true to a lot of the classic plot devices of these stories rather than opting for the more modernistic approaches to the subgenre, such as the tweeny aspects we see in the "Twilight" franchise. For that, I congratulate this film for sticking to its guns. In true Gothic fashion, there's a heaping helping of repressed homoeroticism, unexplained deaths, foggy courtyards, anemic young girls, and mysterious trunks in the basement.
Overall, "The Moth Diaries" is as much of a success as it is a failure. The script is weak and unfortunately fairly stagnant in terms of plot momentum. The dialogue is also poorly-written and the acting from the supporting cast is very much TV-movie status. If you can deal with the teenage melodrama, there are appealing visuals and nice Gothic overtones here as well as parallels to the classics, but I'm not sure that's enough to save the film for most people. 5/10.
I'm going to be frank here; with Mary Harron (the woman behind "The Notorious Bettie Page" and "American Psycho") penning the screenplay for this and directing it, I expected more and got less. I'll begin by telling you what's wrong with this movie and then end my review on a more positive note with what was done well. The biggest problem with this film is, almost fatally, its overall plot structure. Harron's script is terribly choppy, and the transitions in the film are wooden and seem like filler material. Since the film is based on a book that was written in journal form, Harron opted to use internal dialogue and asides from the Rebecca character, drawn out of her diaries. The problem this creates is that her placement of these asides and "thoughts" as they may be come across as inappropriate and almost cheapen the film to Lifetime status. The poor transitions here kill the plot momentum and also eliminate suspense, which a film like this needs in order to gain investment from its audience.
Secondly, there is the dialogue. It's stiff, boring, and completely uninspired, ala a made-for-TV B-movie. Acting-wise, we've got performances all over the spectrum. Sarah Bolger is competent as our obsessive leading lady, and Sarah Gadon is decent as her object of obsession, but neither are particularly impressive. The incredibly good-looking Scott Speedman is awkward as the English professor whose oh-so-convenient literary insight provides the film's classic vampire arcs, but I think his on screen stiffness is more a fault of the script than his acting ability. The other girls in the film are, well... pretty bad. That's all I'm going to say. So, this brings us to Lily Cole, who plays our vampy new girl; simply put, Cole outshines everybody here. Although her role is nothing new in the horror/vampire genre, her embodiment of this classic character was flawless. She plays up the brooding aspects without becoming hammy, and at times comes across as charming and sweet— just like a vampire. Physically speaking, she's intimidating on screen; the camera-work accentuates her height, and her raven hair and doll-like face add to her character's overall eeriness. In short, she's really, really great in this.
In addition to Cole's performance, I also really enjoyed the visual aspects of the film. Where Harron has failed her script, she's succeeded as a visualist. Her work on "American Psycho" displayed her talent for imagery, and she does a great job in that department here. The Gothic overtones and the atmosphere of the school take center stage through the cinematography, and there are several sequences that do impress- the raining blood scene in the school library is the standout scene in the film; visually disturbing as well as thematically relevant.
I'd also like to point out the very obvious allusions that the film makes, the biggest one being to Carmilla, the classic precursor to the vampire novel, and an inspiration for countless horror films. There are parallels to Dracula as well, and the film stays true to a lot of the classic plot devices of these stories rather than opting for the more modernistic approaches to the subgenre, such as the tweeny aspects we see in the "Twilight" franchise. For that, I congratulate this film for sticking to its guns. In true Gothic fashion, there's a heaping helping of repressed homoeroticism, unexplained deaths, foggy courtyards, anemic young girls, and mysterious trunks in the basement.
Overall, "The Moth Diaries" is as much of a success as it is a failure. The script is weak and unfortunately fairly stagnant in terms of plot momentum. The dialogue is also poorly-written and the acting from the supporting cast is very much TV-movie status. If you can deal with the teenage melodrama, there are appealing visuals and nice Gothic overtones here as well as parallels to the classics, but I'm not sure that's enough to save the film for most people. 5/10.