Constance (1998 Video)
wrong point of view
23 October 2009
just a short comment about the vote. click on it and realize the difference between male and female votes... this is porn for women, so you shouldn't overestimate this. i saw the movie (with my girlfriend) and it was refreshing, a very different, but interesting reinvention of probably the oldest movie genre.

it is also very important to understand the idea behind the production of this movie which is described in a manifesto ("THE PUZZY POWER MANIFESTO"). to give you a general understanding, here are the key ideas:

{quote}

1.Plot - The films must have plots. Individual sequences must be linked into a logical chain of emotions, fantasies, passion... The plot must be about something erotic, it must not be too extensive

2.Eroticism - Feelings, passions, sensuality, intimacy, and the lead-up must be emphasized.

3.Visual style - We must see the beauty of the body... The body need not be completely naked, as partial concealment can be far more erotic.

4.Setting - Time and place are not crucial; what matters is what happens in the films.

5. Humour Subtle humour is welcome,...but fun must not be poked at the sexual act itself.

6. What is not allowed There are no restrictions on what may be depicted in the films as long as it is presented in an acceptable way. The only limit is that women must not be subjected to violence or coercion against their will.

7.What we hate … is the oral sex scene where the woman is coerced to perform fellatio, her hair pulled hard, and come is squirted into her face.

{unquote}

I hope this information will help you understand this movie and why man looking for porn would probably give it a bad vote. I won't vote or judge, because i am a man and this is clearly not made for me to enjoy. it's for my girlfriend to enjoy and for me to enjoy her afterwards
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed