4/10
Stupidly underrated
18 November 2003
This movie may not be good and seem slightly 80's but it certainly doesn't deserve to be in the bottom 100. Some of the effects are pretty impressive despite what you read here and the acting is really not bad at all. There are far, far worse flicks out there.

I'd give it a 6/10.
12 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed