Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
The best horror mini-series out there.
9 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Very good movie. Well done. Stephen King has always been one of my favorite authors due to his ability to make his characters seem real and put them in extraordinary situations. This movie watches just like one of his books reads. If you are a fan of his books, then you should be a fan of this movie.

The atmosphere of the movie is amazing. It completely drew me in. I watched it again this month (January) and kept expecting to look out the windows and see a big snow storm. Mike, the constable, is a typical Stephen King good guy who reminds me of another King lawman, Alan Pangborn. Both are pretty righteous men who cannot be bought or dissuaded of their morals no matter what happens. What happens is, in this instance, a truly creepy creature named Linoge. I've read a lot of the posts about SOTC on this site and people have wildly differing opinions about what King should or shouldn't have done with Linoge. I think he wrote (and cast) him perfectly, I wouldn't have changed a thing. The reason King never explains exactly what Linoge is is that it's scarier that way. If you've ever read any interviews or essays by King he believes that in his horror stories his job is to scare people. He did this very effectively in this movie; it was made for TV for crying out loud but it had some very scary moments. Most horror movies don't creep anyone out anymore, they go for the gore factor, but King knows what is scary. The unknown is scary. He just gives hints to Linoge's past (Roanoke island and the fact that Linoge is an acronym to Legion, from the Bible) and the rest is up to the watcher's imagination.

The special effects are great for the budget, I would love to know how they created the storm. Did they build the whole town and then bury it in fake snow? No idea, but it was well done.

SPOILER ALERT

Finally, the ending: A lot of people posting the negative reviews seem to be angry about the ending. It's not a happy ending, but I think it's the only ending that makes any sense. It's realistic. One kid goes with Linoge, or the whole town marches off into the ocean like a bunch of lemmings. What would your town do in such a situation, against an unbeatable adversary? The ending makes the whole thing believable and sets it apart from other Hollywood fluff. It makes you think: what would you do in that situation? Also it kills me that some people give this movie a one or two star rating out of ten because they are mad at the ending. The fact that they are mad enough to take retaliatory action (in the form of a bad review) just shows that they were drawn into the story; that the story succeeded in what it set out to do, to make the audience care about the characters enough that they are upset when the good guys lose. I love it and I tip my hat to King. 10 out of 10!
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Man of the House (I) (2005)
6/10
Better than I thought it would be!
7 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I thought this movie was going to be really bad. The commercials made it look like a buddy comedy between Cedric the Entertainer and Tommy Lee Jones; in truth Cedric wasn't in there all that much. I don't even know why he was in there at all, his character didn't make that much sense. An ex-cheerleader turned ex-con turned snitch turned preacher? They were really reaching on that one, and his character didn't really have anything to do with moving the plot along.

On the other hand, Tommy Lee Jones was great. He plays such a great straight-man to the cheerleaders'antics. Was the plot formulaic? Yes. Could you see some of the jokes coming from a mile away? Yes. Did all that make it any less entertaining and funny? Hell, no! I rented it just because the video store didn't have anything else, but now I'm glad I did. Oh, and the cheerleaders are smoking hot, that never hurt a movie either. Worth the rental.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
GhostWatcher (2002)
2/10
So awful it's unintentionally funny
27 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Let me get one point across: I only gave it a 2 but I liked this movie. I liked it because it was so terrible it was funny; I felt bad for the people who made this movie. The acting was very, very bad but the chicks were pretty good looking. It looked like it was shot on a home video camera. The plot was completely unbelievable (the hero remembered turns and potholes while blindfolded in the back of a van, allowing the other hero to find the house she was taken to by the bad guy). I recommend it to other B-horror movie buffs but not to the casual movie-renter (hence the 2). Oh, one more thing: it had a few good creepy scenes but most of the time it wasn't scary at all.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed