I went into this movie just like many others - seeing the incredibly high score on Rotten Tomatoes - and assumed the film would be a rare treat for horror fans. And while I can't say it didn't have it's moments of greatness, they were sparsely hidden throughout an otherwise mediocre film. So lets break it down and see where they went wrong.
The Acting: I always appreciate new faces, and this film features character types that are all too uncommon to a genre that's always struggled to be fresh and inventive. There are some moments that were generally well-acted, but I can tell you that the one thing that bothered me the most about this film was the amateur hour acting. Throw in some slightly messy dialogue, and this one has no chance. Within the first few minutes of We Are Still Here I think most will realize that they might have made a bad choice in trusting the reviews and shutting out the naysayers. Half the actors seem to at least be able to hold their own, but overall, the entire thing gets dragged down with the core group of characters.
The Story: Actually, somewhat refreshing - if not only because it puts a unique spin on something so overdone in horror. Right from the synopsis you get where it's going, but I don't think you have any idea of how it's going to play out in this one, which should always be welcome. If nothing else, We Are Still Here wins a few points from me here, that is, until the end of the film. See, it seems like we're on track to wrap up nicely, hopefully digging our way up through the muck of the first hour, and then nothing. No great unraveling, no twist that made it worth it, nothing out of the ordinary. Just a typical, if somewhat confused, horror ending.
Everything Else: Make-up and special effects were fantastic for me, but I know there are going to be a lot of mixed feelings on the latter here. I also enjoyed the setting, it fit very well with what the director was trying to accomplish here. And for a first time director, I should say that he doesn't do too bad a job at all. If we threw in a few decent actors, and had a provision or two enter the script, I think we're close to greatness. For me though, it just didn't make it, and left a pretty bland impression overall.
Would I watch it again? Absolutely not. If I could go back and stop myself from watching it in the first place, would I? No. I might save myself a few bucks and rent it instead of buying it outright though..
The Acting: I always appreciate new faces, and this film features character types that are all too uncommon to a genre that's always struggled to be fresh and inventive. There are some moments that were generally well-acted, but I can tell you that the one thing that bothered me the most about this film was the amateur hour acting. Throw in some slightly messy dialogue, and this one has no chance. Within the first few minutes of We Are Still Here I think most will realize that they might have made a bad choice in trusting the reviews and shutting out the naysayers. Half the actors seem to at least be able to hold their own, but overall, the entire thing gets dragged down with the core group of characters.
The Story: Actually, somewhat refreshing - if not only because it puts a unique spin on something so overdone in horror. Right from the synopsis you get where it's going, but I don't think you have any idea of how it's going to play out in this one, which should always be welcome. If nothing else, We Are Still Here wins a few points from me here, that is, until the end of the film. See, it seems like we're on track to wrap up nicely, hopefully digging our way up through the muck of the first hour, and then nothing. No great unraveling, no twist that made it worth it, nothing out of the ordinary. Just a typical, if somewhat confused, horror ending.
Everything Else: Make-up and special effects were fantastic for me, but I know there are going to be a lot of mixed feelings on the latter here. I also enjoyed the setting, it fit very well with what the director was trying to accomplish here. And for a first time director, I should say that he doesn't do too bad a job at all. If we threw in a few decent actors, and had a provision or two enter the script, I think we're close to greatness. For me though, it just didn't make it, and left a pretty bland impression overall.
Would I watch it again? Absolutely not. If I could go back and stop myself from watching it in the first place, would I? No. I might save myself a few bucks and rent it instead of buying it outright though..
Tell Your Friends