Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A Gripping Adaptation Of A Finnish Classic
5 November 2017
The people of Finland, me included, had high expectations for the third film adaptation of Väinö Linna's novel Tuntematon Sotilas (The Unknown Soldier), boldly made by celebrated Finnish director Aku Louhimies for the 100-year anniversary of Finland's independence. I tried my best to block all positive and negative expectations out of my mind, so that I could watch the film with an open mind and form my own opinions. That isn't an easy job, as this story is something very iconic and personal to the Finnish people. After seeing the film and doing a lot of analyzing and over-analyzing about what parts I liked and didn't like, the strongest thought I have is still the one that I had for the movie's entire three-hour run time and in the moments after it: this movie is pretty great.

Everything that I say should be taken with a large grain of salt, as I haven't read the original novel. Therefore my opinions are based partially on a comparison with the original movie from 1955, and mostly on how I liked this as a film of its own and as a part of Finnish culture. The directing by Louhimies is decent, as modern film technology allows for more intense action sequences and realistic sound effects, thus capturing the atmosphere of war well. At times, the modern style was a bit more polished and Hollywood- style than I would've liked - for example I wasn't a big fan of the instrumental soundtrack, which relied on slightly cliché string melodies that took away from the gritty and realistic story. That is a minor complaint though, as for the most part the film did a good job portraying the story in a more modern fashion. Also, it was one of the most justifiable cases for a three-hour run time that I have ever seen - everything was relevant for the plot and character development, and I didn't feel especially bored even once.

The soul of The Unknown Soldier has always been considered to be in the characters, many of whom have a legendary status in Finnish culture. The casting department did an excellent job in finding suitable actors for these roles, as some of the characters are just as interesting or even better than their counterparts in the original film. A good example is lieutenant Koskela, wonderfully played by Jussi Vatanen, who is fleshed out and fascinating to follow throughout the film. Eero Aho fills the shoes of his predecessor Reino Tolvanen amazingly in the iconic role of corporal Antero Rokka, and Hannes Suominen is incredibly similar in his mannerisms to the original film version of the character Vanhala. I was a bit skeptic about the romantic subplot involving the character Kariluoto shown in the trailers, but the film did a great job with it. Having one of the major characters missing someone they truly loved back home added depth to his motivations, making it more relatable when considering what the soldiers were fighting for - and what they risked losing.

The actors must have had a hard job pulling off dialects that aren't typical for today's Finland, but most of them did a great job with it. I was a bit let down by the casting of Aku Hirviniemi as corporal Hietanen, as I felt he didn't come anywhere near the original film's Hietanen in terms of likability and character development. I was also a bit annoyed by the cameo of Finnish teen idol Robin, which took away from the emotion and darkness of an otherwise powerful scene in my opinion. But again, these complaints are small, especially in comparison to everything that the film succeeded in.

In many aspects, the original movie is better, but Louhimies's version also rises higher in quite a few categories. While the 1955 film is a great gritty exploration of Finnish soldiers on the front, the 2017 adaptation is more deep and layered. We see the characters grow through grim moments of pain as well as warm moments of humorous interaction, while certain scenes and story lines provoke thoughts of the larger picture at hand - what the job that soldiers like that did for Finland truly means. As a Finn, I can't view a film like this purely objectively, so the fact that it makes me emotional and grateful of my homeland adds very much to my opinion of the movie. Many moments in the film made me think about the society Finland has today, and how we have it all because men just like the fictional yet realistic characters in this movie once fought to keep Finland independent. That is what makes this film truly powerful and though-provoking, and I admire Aku Louhimies for managing to subtly convey that message into his film without getting over-patriotic about it.

Although the movie has an almost celebratory tone at times (which is proper considering the year of its release), it certainly doesn't fall into the trap of over-romanticizing or glorifying war. Though there are moments of heroics and bravery, there are themes of cowardice, conflict within the Finnish side and human cruelty throughout the film. It gives a gripping account on the lives of Finnish soldiers during the Continuation War, and doesn't try to hide painful facts like Finland's partnership with Nazi Germany or the one-time execution of own troops for disobeying commands. All in all, Louhimies's films manages to capture the audience with a deep and powerful story, filled with memorable characters, great acting and a brutally honest depiction of war.
73 out of 81 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
House of Cards: Chapter 53 (2017)
Season 5, Episode 1
The Same Old Show We Love - Exciting New Story Lines
30 May 2017
The much-anticipated fifth season of House Of Cards opens with a strong and exciting premier, which promises a great direction for the season. The aftermath of the previous season's events, combined with the setup for episodes to come, build an entertaining and well- made season opener. The writing, directing and overall atmosphere of the show are the same as we know and love, with not too much changed. Still, it's clearly a new season and the story has a good direction.

With the election between Underwood and Conway not far ahead, tensions across parties start to boil. Without giving away any specific plot points, I can say that the tense relationship between Democrats and Republicans is portrayed well and fascinatingly in this episode. What each party wants to do in congress sets up two very intriguing story lines, and I can't wait to see how they play out.

The acting is strong as always. Kevin Spacey and company pull off great performances as the characters we know and love (or hate), and all characters fit into the puzzle naturally and all have a role to play. One of the most fascinating aspects in this show is how it portrays politics as a game, where our main character must progress through any given obstacle. Each episode has a sense of progression and evolving in the Underwoods' plan, and this one is no different. Watching the characters play each other is exciting, and moral ambiguity on all sides makes it hard to choose who to root for.

The episode touches on multiple topical issues, including terror, tension and hatred between political parties, and conflict between government and media. Whether or not this season has drawn inspiration from real-life events, it creates interesting parallels to current US politics. Hats off to this show's writers for coming up with a political drama almost as dark, brutal and full of twists than the one we really have. I'm excited to see how the rest of this promising season unfolds.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Arrow: Schism (2016)
Season 4, Episode 23
Solid If Not Perfect Ending For An Uneven Season
2 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Yes, I really liked the season 4 finale of Arrow. I think it did a good job bringing the sometimes-great sometimes-lame season to a close, and I definitely believe that it doesn't deserve all the hate it's getting. Sure, there are some flaws and parts that I didn't like, hence it being my least favorite Arrow finale and getting "only" an 8/10 rating. But in my opinion the episode's pros easily outweigh the cons, hence it deserving an 8/10 rating. It's not perfect, but I feel that it is an overall awesome episode and certainly not deserving of a 5.4 rating.

This season started out strong, but there were some disappointing episodes towards the end. I was especially let down by Broken Hearts and Beacon Of Hope, and they had me worried of the finale. However, Schism was a lot better than I expected, although there were parts to it that weren't so great. That mainly includes the grand plan of the season's main villain, Damien Darhk. Darhk was well written as a character and Neal Mcdonough acted the role amazingly well, but the writers made a misstep with his big plan. The stakes were "too high" for most of the episode; when the villain's plan was to end the world in nuclear fire, we all knew he wouldn't succeed and the good guys would win. That may sound typical for superhero fiction, but the previous three seasons of Arrow have had real-seeming threats that gave out a sense of despair, and that always added so much to the story. In here, the enemy plan succeeding wasn't believable for a second, and that's the main problem lowering my rating. Other than, there isn't much to complain about in concerning this episode.

Oliver Queen, the protagonist of the series, was at his absolute best throughout the episode. His speech to the people of Star City was emotionally powerful, and his overall character arch this season wrapped up very well. From him rightfully killing Darhk all the way to him becoming mayor, all these moments perfected his character and set up interesting developments for season 5. The flashback story line also ended nicely, as Reiter got defeated and Oliver decided to head for Russia. Hopefully that means that we'll see Anatoly again next season, as well as an explanation for the whole Bratva thing. One thing I also enjoyed character-wise was all that they did with Oliver and Felicity; I was expecting that they would get back together in the finale, which would've been frustrating and over- predictable after everything we've seen. Instead, we had them as friends, much like in the first (and best) couple of Arrow seasons. This was a smart decision from the writers, and the acting and dialogue between Stephen Amell and Emily Bett Rickards was the best it has been in a long time.

All of the other characters were also great. Diggle had to confront his inner demons, Lance had a great moment deciding to come back and help Oliver, Merlyn was intriguing and captivating as always, and Thea had some nice moments too. Laurel was also clearly present in the characters' minds and spirits, giving a fine sense of closure on her part. The most surprisingly awesome character, however, was Curtis Holt. I grew to like him early on this season, but I never expected to like him that much. He was just amazing - or rather *terrific* - in the episode, especially in the scenes where he's giving hope and optimism to the desperate team. I'm really looking forward to seeing more of his character next season. I respect the writer's decision to take many of the members off the team for a while, as it makes sense with their character arcs and gives the show room for fresh developments, but I do hope that they bring them back to the main team eventually. Especially John Diggle - the series just wouldn't be the same without him.

John Behring's directing is magnificent as always. While the fight scene between the Green Arrow and Damien Darhk may not be quite on the same level as the final fights from previous seasons, it still is well- choreographed, well-acted and intensely entertaining. The episode has an overall sentimental atmosphere, balancing between dark and hopeless character moments, glorious and epic scenes and touching sendoffs. This fits well with the season's themes of darkness and light, as does Blake Neely's score, as engaging as ever. All in all, I regard Schism as one of the best episodes in the roller-coaster of season 4, and it sets the table for the next season. It really says something about a series, that even when the season finale ties all its story lines up with a sense of closure and leaves no cliffhangers, I still can't wait to see how all of it continues in season five.

  • The enemy plan wasn't believable - Not as good overall as first three season finales + Oliver's arc + Oliver and Felicity as friends + Great character moments + Good setup for season 5 + Sense of closure + Directing and soundtrack + Curtis being a boss
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Star Trek II: Vengeance And Thrills With An Emotional Kick
27 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
When I first saw Star Trek II: The Wrath Of Khan, my expectations weren't too high. The first movie had been such a letdown for me, and I knew sequels better than the original to be a very rare thing. So, I was quite surprised when the end credits started to roll; I had just witnessed an entertaining, thrilling, memorable and all- around awesome movie. Most Trek fans seem to consider this to be the best movie in the entire franchise, and while it only reaches fourth place on my list, I do understand why this is the #1 favorite for so many. There is so much that this film does right, and so little to complain about.

The movie is a sequel, not only to The Motion Picture, but also to Space Seed, an episode from the original series. It continues the story left open in that episode, as the villain Khan returns - with a plan of vengeance against Captain Kirk and his crew. The film begins with members of the original crew overseeing the Kobayashi Maru test, after which we see some surprisingly deep character development from Kirk's part. With these very moments, the movie establishes that it has an exciting and creative story element in it, as well as good character writing with a sense of humanity - two things very much missing in the first Trek film. As the story progresses, the audience is treated to several iconic scenes: from Khan's epic return, through Kirk's powerful scream of rage, all the way to Spock's heartbreaking death - more on that one later. The movie is extremely well-written, as the story keeps fresh and engaging while offering many sides to the characters and events, as well as avoiding any dull moments.

Nicholas Meyer does a great job directing. Everything in the movie, from the sets and lighting all the way to the camera-work and soundtrack, just feels much more natural and well-made than in the previous installment. And I won't just compare this film to its predecessor which I didn't like, as that doesn't say much; I also think that this movie does a far better job as a production and as a work of art than most of the sci-fi films I have seen, certainly most of the other Star Trek films. It's great that they got the original cast to return once again, as the acting is also top notch. But as good as the main Enterprise crew is, the perhaps greatest performance is given by Ricardo Montalban, who plays the character Khan to perfection.

To this day, Khan is the best Star Trek villain, in the opinion of me and many others. The battle of wits between him and Kirk remains at the center of the stage for most of the movie, and gets more and more exhilarating as the run time progresses. But the single greatest part of this film, to me at least, is Spock's sacrifice at the end. Not very often do I find an individual scene to be the absolutely best thing in a feature film, but that is the case with The Wrath Of Khan. Everything about that moment is perfect - the pure emotional impact it has on the viewer, the incredible acting from Shatner and Nimoy, the pitch perfect dialogue between Spock and Kirk in his final moments, and the overall effect that is has on the story - not only the story of this movie, but of the franchise in general. Kirk's line about Spock's soul being the most human he ever knew is possibly the most emotionally powerful line I have ever seen in a movie - something that I definitely didn't expect from a Star Trek sequel. The way they bring the movie to an end is absolutely beautiful.

All in all, I find this to be one of the best Star Trek films. It definitely deserves its acclaim as a science fiction landmark and a turning point for the franchise. I don't regard it to be the 'best sci-fi film of all time' or 'a flawless masterpiece' like many do, as there are better films in the genre - even in the franchise. But while this movie isn't perfect, it certainly is a groundbreaking and awesome film worth watching quite a few times. I definitely believe that the legacy of this movie will live long and prosper.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Arrow: Sins of the Father (2016)
Season 4, Episode 13
John Barrowman Shines In A Gripping And Powerful Episode
23 July 2016
While the fourth season of Arrow hasn't been on the same level as the previous seasons as a whole, there are absolutely amazing individual episodes in the mix. A good example is Sins Of The Father, quite possibly my favorite episode of this season so far. It does a good job combining the best characters, story lines and other elements of the series, resulting in a powerful and memorable episode.

Malcolm Merlyn has always been the most intriguing and well-written character on Arrow - or in the whole CW/DC television universe for that matter. The way the character is constantly flailing between good and bad, trustworthy and betraying, likable and frustrating, all of that just makes him into such a great character. And this episode highlights that, as John Barrowman gives his best acting performance so far and his character becomes even more fascinating. All of his scenes here are pure gold, and that alone makes the episode stand out.

In a bigger picture, the episode succeeds on more levels than just utilizing one amazing character. There's also the drama with Thea's life hanging in the balance, intertwined with the League Of Assassins descending to the brink of a civil war. I won't give away any specific plot details, but many of the story lines that have been building up for multiple seasons come down to a boiling point. The rivalry between Nyssa and Merlyn makes for a fresh break from the episodes focused on defeating Damien Darkh and his people. Towards the end of the episode, we are also treated to one of the best fight scenes in Arrow history, as two major characters duel one another. The directing, choreography, acting, soundtrack and everything else about that scene is just breathtaking.

In an even bigger picture, this episode deals with a large theme - fatherhood. This is accomplished in many ways from many directions: Merlyn doing anything in his power to save his daughter, Felicity's father trying to reconnect with her, and even references to Oliver's son William and their distant relationship. Also Nyssa going up against her father's legacy goes together with this theme. 'Sins Of The Father' as a title describes the episode quite well, as many of the father-characters do questionable things with more or less good intentions, giving a conflicting view on the subject.

The episode ends on a brutal twist that I won't spoil here. I partially saw it coming, but not in a bad and predictable way, rather a slow-burning "It all lead up to this moment" way. I am excited (and slightly terrified) to see what follows from here. All in all, this episode shows season 4's full potential, and hopefully we'll have more like this towards the end of the season. I can only keep guessing what Darkh is planning for next, and I'm definitely looking forward to seeing where Merlyn's character arc goes from here.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Star Trek I: All Uphill From Here
23 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Star Trek: The Motion Picture works in many ways. It works as a reunion of the original cast that revitalized the franchise and gave room for much better sequels. It works as a showcasing of 1979's spectacular visual effects. Most of all, it works as a way to effectively shut up the people who say the first installment of a movie series is always the best.

As a fan of the Star Trek franchise, from the visionary original series all the way to the epic JJ Abrams reboot films, I must say that I couldn't help being disappointed by this movie. In my honest opinion, this is the least good of all 12 Star Trek movies (I haven't seen Beyond yet), for even The Final Frontier and Nemesis, generally considered to be the worst of the bunch, were more enjoyable experiences for me. It's weird how the first feature film in such an iconic and beloved saga manages to be such a let-down, but at least for me this one is Hollywood's big anomaly - the number one film that falls short of all its sequels.

The movie starts quite intriguingly, as a few minutes of darkness accompanied by a great soundtrack reminiscent of 2001: A Space Odyssey are followed by a scene where Klingon vessels are attacked by an unknown life form. After this, the film fails to reach that height of interest again. With a universe filled with Gene Roddenberry's genius concepts, I can not fathom how the writers couldn't think of a better story idea for their first movie. The entire plot circling around a mysterious space cloud appearing, The Enterprise travelling to investigate the space cloud, finding out its origin and sending it back, is very uninspired compared to many later - and earlier - Star Trek scripts.

Robert Wise's directing just doesn't sit right for a Trek film. All the best movies and episodes of the franchise, whether they've been from the 60's or 2010's or anywhere in between, have shared the same trademark atmosphere. And that feeling is thoroughly missing from this one. The pacing of the movie is also off, as we spend several minutes with boring visual effect show-off scenes that do nothing to further the plot, as well as many conversations so forgettable that it's hard to remember what happened the moment the dialogue is over. Where are the entertaining and well-written character interactions of the original TV series? Where is the unique creativity of the sci-fi genre that most of the franchise has embraced? And why didn't the filmmakers focus on doing a movie for this awesome franchise instead of trying to rip off Star Wars and 2001? These are the questions I've been wondering about ever since I saw this film.

The best aspect of the movie is the cast. In an age of difficult acting contracts and recasting issues, it's great that they got the entire original main crew back. The way they all enter the ship and come together one at a time is admittedly cool, and Shatner, Nimoy and co. give out decent performances. Still, while it's always a treat to see that cast working together, none of them are quite at their best here. The villain of the film, V'Ger, has a very interesting concept, however the execution of the idea behind it lacks interest and the whole thing falls flat in the end. So even the most fascinating science fiction concept within the movie doesn't really work out, which is a shame.

Of course I have to mention Jerry Goldsmith's score, an other upside for this film. The music is epic and magical, and is one of the qualities that prevent me from giving the movie a rating lower than 5, despite the film being such a mess. The soundtrack is especially powerful in the scenes where the USS Enterprise is shown, as well as the beautiful shots of space throughout the movie. These scenes are a pleasure to watch at first, but the movie overuses them to the point where the viewer loses all interest.

All in all, the Star Trek film series kicks off with a rocky start. As many complaints as I have, I am thankful for this movie existing, as it paves the way for some of the best sci-fi movies of all time. Despite the film's many flaws, I recognize the good aspects within it, and respect the time used to create the state-of-the-art visual effects (for the time being) and the spectacular soundtrack. Still, this installment does leave an overall negative impact on a viewer like myself, hence being on the bottom of my ranking of the Star Trek films. And while this may not be the best starting point for someone getting into the franchise, it is a must-see for Trek fans - even kind of a classic in its own twisted way.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Who Though This Was A Good Idea?
22 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The only reason I went to see this movie was that I had lost a bet with a friend. The punishment was "having to watch this bad-sounding film", but I was determined to watch it with an open mind, not letting my expectations cloud my judgment. I was completely ready to like this movie had it been surprisingly good...sadly it wasn't. Due to IMDb guidelines, I am warning that this review contains spoilers. However I recommend reading it before watching the film nonetheless, as giving away plot points might work as an attempt to save whoever reads this from seeing the movie. You're welcome.

I graciously give this reboot a 4/10 rating. You can think of that as a rating for either an otherwise decent film with extremely many flaws, or a basically terrible film with some redeeming qualities. A part of me wants to give an even lower rating, but I have to admit that some aspects of the movie were quite good, if not good enough for it to be an overall pleasant cinematic experience. Much like the Ghostbusters franchise, I'll start with the good parts.

Despite the characters being annoying (more on that later), the level of acting is fairly decent. One of the four main characters, Jillian Holtzmann played by Kate McKinnon, is actually quite funny and likable. Chris Hemsworth also has enjoyable moments, and Bill Murray and Sigourney Weaver's cameos are cool. It was also nice to hear the original theme song, and some of the references to the original movie were clever. That concludes the good sides to this film.

The rest of it is more or less a disappointing and aggravating mess. The concept of making a feminist all-female reboot for Ghostbusters was questionable as it was, but here's the terrible part: the point of making a feminist all-female reboot is destroyed by the main characters being annoying over-the-top parodies of the female gender. This movie somehow manages to be offensive towards everyone by trying to appeal to everyone. For example I think the negative reception of the black character Patty isn't racist; what IS racist is the writers of the movie making her into the most stereotypical black character in cinematic history. I'm not saying that all characters should be politically correct and defy stereotypes, I'm just saying that a such a cliché character is unfunny and annoying to watch.

But all that is only a small part of why this movie fails. As a fantasy/sci-fi film, it's very unoriginal and boring, and as a comedy, most of the humor consists of completely dumb jokes that make you groan and sigh instead of letting out the smallest laugh. There is no sign of the fresh and genius humor that the original Ghostbusters was filled with. The dialogue is horrible, while clearly trying to be clever and witty. And there are just so many individual moments that are absolutely ridiculous, from the over-cheesy "Who wants to go save New York City?" line (answered by the girls cheering "Whooooo!"), all the way to the climax where the girls defeat the final ghost by shooting him in the groin. Now as I said, some of the references to the original movie were clever. However, most of them are so on-the-nose that they force one to roll their eyes. A fine example of this is the origin scene of the Ghostbusters logo. Watching that scene, even a child who hasn't seen the film could easily guess where it's leading to several minutes before the "big and clever reveal", which the filmmakers clearly tried to make into an epic moment, whereas it turned out as laughably dumb and almost painful to watch.

Now this movie gives a feeling of glory and happiness once it ends. As the credits start to roll, the viewer feels free, relieved that it's all over. Then, they're treated to a series of MANY mid-credit scenes, which a curious viewer like myself is forced to sit through after coming that far. After suffering through the credits, I now know what horror movie protagonists feel like when the monster comes back for one last scare.

All in all, I strongly recommend passing this abomination of a summer blockbuster and re-watching the original movie instead. Of course this is just my opinion, and there are bound to be people who like this movie, and I am very interested in hearing their reasoning. But for me personally, this movie was so bad in so many ways, that I felt the need to write this review. Usually I'd end with a joke or reference tying up my take on the film, but this one doesn't deserve the time of coming up with something, so I'll end this in a dull and humorless fashion - very much in the spirit of the movie.
14 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Game of Thrones: Home (2016)
Season 6, Episode 2
Masterpiece
2 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Game Of Thrones is the best show on television. No other series can create so much intrigue, beauty, quality, shock and pure epic storytelling into just one episode - and keeping doing it over and over again. This episode left me literally gazing at the TV with my eyes wide and mouth open, absolutely speechless. No other series has had quite this kind of effect on me, but with this HBO drama it isn't even the first time. So what makes this episode so great?

Let's start with the beginning of the episode. And yes, there will be spoilers ahead. We start off with the long-awaited return of Bran Stark, as we see him and the Three-Eyed Raven watching a vision of Winterfell. This is an awesome and entertaining scene, as we see a young Ned Stark, a more chatty Hodor, and Lyanna Stark herself. With her being introduced and with more visions of the past likely to come, I can only hope for a certain fan theory to be confirmed this season. Anyways, seeing Bran and his company again was amazing and I can't wait to see what happens to them next.

Between the best parts of the episode (the first and last sequences) there are many great scenes. Ramsay's rise to power in Winterfell is perfectly executed in all its shock and darkness. The exchange between Sansa and Theon is probably the most emotional moment so far in season 6. The situation in King's Landing is getting more intense, and I was happy to see some well-written character development for Tommen Baratheon, who I had previously thought to be one of the weaker characters in the show. In the story lines taking place across the Narrow Sea, we are shown a few very suspenseful sequences: Tyrion trying to be friendly with the dragons, and Arya being tempted to speak her name. Both characters made difficult choices, that would seem to be the right ones - but only time will tell for sure. We also got to see the return of House Greyjoy in all its might. This provides for some great plot elements, from Balon Greyjoy's sudden death to the introduction of Euron Greyjoy, who gives the first impression of being a truly compelling character.

The absence of some story lines, like Daenerys or Dorne, was a good decision. With so much happening in one episode, trying to cram in something from every side of the story would have felt rushed and unnecessary. The writers didn't kill any time with filler material, but rather fit the perfect amount of epic storytelling into one episode. The story wasn't the only thing making this episode so incredible: Jeremy Podeswa's unique directing, the astonishing scenery and cinematography and the absolutely remarkable acting all helped shape this episode into the masterpiece that it is.

Finally, I would like to talk about the ending. Seeing Jon Snow come back to life (more or less) wasn't the most shocking surprise, but the way it was done was completely mesmerizing. The soundtrack in the final scene was extremely powerful, and the course of events was just perfect. Everything leading up to that moment was done right, and they couldn't have pulled it off any better. There are going to be people who say Game Of Thrones "jumped the shark" with bringing Jon back, as well as people who say the twist didn't work because it was "overly predictable". The way I see it, there's not much point in ruining a series this good by looking for things to complain about by over-thinking everything. So I hope that most of the viewers will be able to enjoy this episode as much as I did, or more, if that is possible. And if this review seems over-the-top in its praise for Game Of Thrones, that might be attributed to the fact that there are no words to describe exactly how good I find this show to be - I'm sure many fans can relate.
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Game of Thrones: The Red Woman (2016)
Season 6, Episode 1
Beautifully Back On Track
1 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
After spending nearly a year recovering from the shocking events of the thrilling season 5 finale of Game Of Thrones, I was very excited to see how the sixth season would kick off. Mother's Mercy had left so much open, and this episode did a great job in dealing with the fallout of all the game-changing events. As always, the cast gave strong performances and the visuals were stunning, but the best thing about this series has always been the pure storytelling.

Starting off right from where they left off last season was a smart choice. Too many shows have started using excessive time jumps between seasons, but this episode provides intrigue by showing the immediate aftermath of events like - spoiler alert - the heart- wrenching death of Jon Snow. Tensions rise high at Castle Black, setting up for an interesting clash of wills in the following episodes. This also leads to the best moment of this season premier: the ending scene. The revelation of Melisandre's true self is a perfectly executed scene, managing to create a truly creepy atmosphere while raising quite a few questions. Just when I thought the Red Woman couldn't get any more mysterious and compelling as a character, the show pulls this twist. And I can't wait to see what follows.

The other story lines are more or less amazing as well. Sansa and Theon getting rescued by Brienne and Podrick is an interesting plot development, while the bitterness between Ramsay and Roose Bolton in Winterfell provides a good measure of drama. The scenes in King's Landing are fantastic as always, and the Dorne story surprises with a very interesting turn of events, as the Sand Snakes seem to grab the power from the ruling Martells. All in all, the story lines in Westeros keep up the quality and interest of the series by showing satisfying conclusions to the fifth season's cliffhangers while setting up the story arcs for season 6.

Across the Narrow Sea, the story is every bit as good. The scene with Arya is a nice addition to her colorful character arc, and the scene with Daenerys really makes the viewer feel for her. Jorah and Daario trying to track her is also interesting to follow, and the chemistry between the two actors is quite good. Speaking of chemistry between actors, Conleth Hill and Peter Dinklage are perfect as the reunited duo of Varys and Tyrion. The dialogue among the two is perfect, and the political situation in Meereen gives an impression of being one of the strongest story arcs for season 6.

I've heard a lot of negative reactions to this episode's slow pace. While I respect the opinion of more critical fans, I couldn't disagree any more with these particular opinions. In many ways, the intrigue of "slow" storytelling has been one of the very best things in Game Of Thrones. The reason why all of the earth-shattering twists in the show are so great is that they usually follow a chain of slow- burning setup episodes. The events of the series develop chapter by chapter, which makes the story extremely interesting. "The Red Woman" stands out as a remarkable season opener, as it does a perfect job in two things: a very satisfying aftermath to the stories left open in season 5, and an incredibly fascinating setup for the rest of the season.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DC's Legends of Tomorrow: Progeny (2016)
Season 1, Episode 10
The Good, The Bad And The Polarizing
13 April 2016
The tenth episode of Legends Of Tomorrow, titled "Progeny", definitely has its ups and downs. My opinion is divided, but ultimately there was more good to it than bad, so my vote is 7. Without giving away any spoilers, here's what I didn't like about the episode:

Most of the episode relied on a moral conflict that was based on very flawed logic. I can't go into detail without giving away the plot, but given the facts of the situation, the characters' choices don't make sense. This sort of thing doesn't usually bother me, especially in a series like this, but in this particular episode the lack of logic is so clear it becomes a bit annoying. The story also completely negates the ending of the previous episode. At the end of episode 9, Rip makes a big deal of not going to the year 2147 before since it's so dangerous. This made me excited, but Rip's warning turns out to be quite wrong, as this journey becomes one of their safest ones. The time period had some threats to it, but nothing that the previous episode made it sound like.

Then for the things I liked. This basically includes everything else in the episode. The scenes with Ray Palmer realizing what his inventions have become were great, and Brandon Routh's acting was the best it has been so far. The flashbacks to Kendra and Carter were also well done, as it provided both depth to Kendra's character and gave closure to Carter. I also enjoyed the scenes between Leonard and Mick, who are both going through well-written character arcs. This episode also had good special effects, which went well with the extremely entertaining action sequence towards the end. Ten episodes into the series, it's still thrilling to watch the heroes using their powers in fighting sequences.

All things considered, this was my least favorite episode of the show so far. It wasn't too bad though, and I'm still definitely looking forward to the rest of the season. I've heard rumors of a certain classic DC character appearing in the next episode, so that's something to look forward to.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DC's Legends of Tomorrow: White Knights (2016)
Season 1, Episode 4
Solid Continuation
10 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Breaking into the Pentagon. If that were to happen in any other series I know about, they would devote an entire episode to it (perhaps even a few episodes or an entire season). But that's where Legends Of Tomorrow is different from other shows. It showcases its signature extreme fast pace by writing a break-in to the Pentagon - into the opening sequence. The team plans the heist and performs it, getting it over with by the five-minute mark. I understand that moments like this turn a lot of people off, but for a viewer like myself, there's nothing wrong with it. It gives a good example of the writers' creativity, as they can afford to use so many high- concept ideas in each episode, and also provides some spectacular entertainment. One minute the heroes are in the middle of a quick heist into an impenetrable headquarters, the next they're whisked away to Soviet Russia for their next crazy adventure. Sure, none of this is realistic or credible - but after all, it's important to remember that this is a sci-fi series based on time-travelling comic book heroes.

Although the rest of the episode doesn't quite live up to its monumental opening scene, it still manages to be a solid chapter in this evolving and unpredictable story. In the main plot of the episode, we are introduced to Valentina Vostok. She makes an impression as a passable villain on the way to the larger threat, Vandal Savage, who we don't see in this episode. Valentina is working on a Soviet version of Firestorm, which could have terrible consequences on the future. The episode ends with a massive cliffhanger, as Stein, Palmer and Rory are imprisoned in a gulag.

The subplots in the episode are decent as well. Having Sara and Kendra train (and fight) each other gave their characters more depth and a good role for the episode, while the story with Rip and Heatwave almost getting trapped by Chronos was intense. The colorful cast of characters is finally settling in by the fourth episode, and now we really get to see them evolve. The introduction to all of the Legends (with the possible exception of Rip) in the first episode felt a little bit rushed, but now the show is at a point where the viewers are getting to know them better - just like they're getting more familiar with each other. Some kind of a connection between the audience and the characters is important for any show, and this one is starting to succeed on that front.

All in all, White Knights was another awesome episode of this underrated series. Sure, the dialogue may not be the world's finest and the story doesn't have the depth of the many quality dramas out there, but that's not what the series is based on. By every episode it's becoming more clear that the reason why Legends Of Tomorrow is isolating so many viewers is simply because it doesn't try to achieve more than what it is: an entertaining show with intriguing time travel, compelling characters and a comic-book atmosphere. And that right there makes it a great show in its own league.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DC's Legends of Tomorrow: Blood Ties (2016)
Season 1, Episode 3
Superhero Time Travel In All Its Beauty
20 March 2016
"I've seen darker days. I've seen men of steel die and dark knights fall, and even then I accomplished my mission no matter what". With this epic line, Rip Hunter sets the tone for another splendid episode of Legends Of Tomorrow. It's often the little things, like this reference to DC's most distinguished superheroes, that make this series so fun to watch. However, this episode succeeds on a larger scale as well. The main plot of the season advances well enough, but it's the individual story lines of this episode alone that are truly remarkable.

Take the subplot with Ray, Kendra and Dr. Stein for example. It keeps the viewer entertained with short scenes throughout the episode, providing some well-written character development - as well as admittedly cool sci-fi scenes. The storyline with Leonard Snart trying to alter his past for the better was even better. It brought a good measure of emotion to the episode, as well as an interesting addition to the aspect of time travel in the show. The character development works there as well; it's becoming clear that of the two criminal buddies, Rory is more "rotten to the core", whereas Snart has a good heart but was driven to his way of life through a rough traumatic childhood. It'll be interesting to see if working with the team of good-willed heroes will guide Snart towards redemption - and if it will ever affect Rory in any way.

In my review for the previous episode, I pointed out how Vandal Savage isn't such a great villain. However, this episode made his character more interesting. This happened through revelations of his past with Rip Hunter, as well as the utter creepiness in the scene with Savage and Carter's body. I'm intrigued to see what else the writers have in store for this increasingly compelling villain.

The action, as always, is outstanding. The fighting scenes with White Canary were enjoyable to watch, if slightly worrisome for the character. The Lazarus Pit clearly had a strong effect on her humanity. Despite all of the bloodlust business, I still find Sara to be a likable character. Rip also remains a strong protagonist, especially now that he has (allegedly) decided to be completely honest with the group. It remains to be seen whether he will stick to this promise or not.

The ending of the episode sets up for an exciting follow-up - in the 1980's. The time travel in the series has gotten more interesting, after a first impression that made it seem like a Doctor Who rip- off. I haven't read any of the comics, so I can't say how well the time travel is adapted from the source, but I do like the way it's written into the show. As the episodes go by, more layers to it are uncovered and explored, making for good storytelling. All in all, the third episode of DC's Legends Of Tomorrow is a great one, and I can't wait to see what comes next.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DC's Legends of Tomorrow: Pilot, Part 2 (2016)
Season 1, Episode 2
Outstanding Action And Decent Character Development
19 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The second part of this spectacular sci-fi pilot didn't impress me quite as much as the first one, but it comes close. The "legends" navigate their way through new twists and turns as the plot unfolds into a new direction and the characters get more fleshed out. And be warned: there are spoilers of this episode ahead.

In this episode, the team continues its efforts to stop Vandal Savage in the 1970's. One of the best parts of this installment is the action sequence where the main characters interrupt a massive arms deal in Norway. It's a perfect showcase of the insane, fast-paced comic book entertainment that makes this series so engaging - to the right audience. I definitely belong to said audience, as I enjoyed watching this chaotic fight scene. Heat Wave and Captain Cold making a mess, Hawkman and Hawkgirl soaring over the battle to confront Savage, Firestorm taking care of a nuclear bomb, White Canary showing her awesome sword fighting skills - what's not to like? The shot of Atom flying across the area from Stein's pocket to the other end of the room was especially fantastic.

From there, the story progresses to an interesting new level, as Martin Stein meets with his younger self. This leads to some humorous moments as well as emotional ones. Meanwhile, a break-in gone wrong on Snart, Rory and Palmer's part leads to an intense confrontation with Savage - and the death of Hawkman. It was more surprising than it was sad to see him go, seeing as the character hadn't been developed much. With a show like this and a character like Hawkman, it wouldn't be too big a shocker if the writers find a way to bring him back eventually. But for now, he's dead, and Savage remains at large.

One two-part pilot isn't enough to properly and fully introduce ten major characters (Rip, the legends and Savage), so there's still a lot to learn of these colorful personalities - though this episode did a good job at fleshing them out more. Rip asserts himself as an honest and confident leader, while Dr. Stein's characteristics are explored through two different stages in his life. Sara seems to be acting quite humanly despite all the Lazarus Pit business. Flashbacks shed light on Carter and Kendra, as well as on Vandal Savage himself. Based on the two first episodes, he isn't exactly the greatest supervillain out there, but I suppose he gets the job done for the purposes of the story. I'm slightly skeptical of a 16- episode season devoted to the team stopping him, but I won't judge until I've seen how it plays out. So far the writers have found good ways to slow the characters down with various twists and obstacles, and I have a feeling they still have quite a few aces up their sleeves.

The rest of the main cast require more development before I can form a proper opinion on how they are written. So far, Ray Palmer seems likable and interesting, while Leonard Snart and Mick Rory make a first impression as entertaining - if a bit too cheesy - anti-heroes. Jax is also coming across as a good character, and I think people are complaining about Franz Drameh's acting too much. Speaking of acting, this episode has some strong performances - especially Victor Garber as Dr. Stein, as well as Arthur Darvill's continually brilliant performance as Rip Hunter.

All in all, Legends Of Tomorrow's second episode may not be perfect, but in my opinion it's definitely worth watching and easily enough to keep me hooked. The ending (in which, by the way, Hunter seemed to break the fourth wall for a second - it's hard to say for sure) sets up for an exciting third episode, so it looks like the series continues to ride on a strong note.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DC's Legends of Tomorrow: Pilot, Part 1 (2016)
Season 1, Episode 1
Legends Of Tomorrow - Overly Criticized Today
14 March 2016
In the age we live in, any television show or movie that features an unrealistic plot or "cheesy" dialogue is immediately attacked by most critical reviewers. There are times when this criticism is on the spot and deserved, but there are times when it goes too far as well. In my opinion, DC's Legends Of Tomorrow is a good example of the latter - it has gotten a staggering amount of negative reviews for things like unrealistic storytelling and cliché characters. I think people should remember that this is a show based on comic books about time travelling superheroes.

It was great when Christopher Nolan's Dark Knight -trilogy proved that superhero films can be dark and realistic (to some extent). But that doesn't mean that every movie and series should do the same. I actually respect Legends Of Tomorrow for capturing the comic book atmosphere so well. The story is admittedly ridiculous most of the time, but in a good way. It feels like watching an old-school superhero comic book - straight from TV. After all, when the point of fiction as a concept has often been to make things possible that couldn't happen in real life, it doesn't make sense for EVERYTHING to be down-to-earth and plausible. Everything that happens in this show is more or less crazy - and that's what makes it so entertaining for me.

This pilot episode had me hooked. Time travel has always been a fascinating storytelling device to me, and this show uses it well. As someone who hasn't watched Arrow or The Flash (except for the first episodes), the character introductions felt slightly rushed and confusing, but I liked them anyway. Arthur Darvill does a decent performance as protagonist Rip Hunter, who seems to be more of an intriguing and colorful character than the rest of the team (at least based on this episode). Atom, as well as both halves of Firestorm, seem like interesting characters as well. The rest of the main cast didn't especially interest me yet, but I'm sure they'll get more fleshed out in future episodes.

The main villain, Vandal Savage, makes a good first impression. He also serves as a good motive to bring the main characters together. I won't spoil anything for those who haven't seen this, but there's a certain twist towards the end of the episode that makes the story much more interesting. I think the future of this show looks bright, and I can't wait to see what happens next.

The directing by Glen Winter is solid, and the writers do a good job in setting up the story. The visual effects may not be state of the art, but they get the job done well enough. The instrumental soundtrack is surprisingly good, as it really captures the feeling of this team of characters on an epic mission. All in all, I really liked this pilot and I think it's getting too much negative criticism for being what it is - an entertaining sci-fi series that's fun and engaging to watch.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
House of Cards: Chapter 40 (2016)
Season 4, Episode 1
Return To Top Form
4 March 2016
As someone who was slightly let down by the season 3 finale, I think the opening episode of season 4 was a surprisingly good way of continuing the course of the story and setting up an exciting new season. The fresh progression of the plot seems extremely promising, and I can't wait for what comes next.

The episode begins with the unexpected return of a certain important character, and that immediately sets the course for the episode's fresh story lines. Besides that, the episode focuses mostly on Frank and Claire's personal situations, as well as the New Hampshire primary. This episode could've focused a little more on the politics and a little less on the relationship drama, but I'm sure the rest of the season will have more political intrigue in it.

The acting is top notch as usual, especially the performances by Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright. Neve Campbell also does a decent guest performance, and I hope we'll be seeing more of her character in the future. The dialogue between many of the characters is well done and fascinating. The episode is also directed very well, as its atmosphere makes it stand out as a new chapter for the show's story. The writing, as always, is pure quality.

All in all, I think that Chapter 40 is the start of a fresh direction for House Of Cards, while also continuing the story and style of the series without changing too much. It looks like we're headed for another great season!
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed