Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Dead Zone (2002–2007)
A Huge Disappointment
18 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I have been reading Stephen King novels for almost thirty years, way before his name became bigger than the title on the cover. During those years King has reached many peaks, along with a few troughs. In my opinion, his finest work was The Dead Zone. When the feature film was released in 1983 I was so disappointed that David Cronenburg had missed the point of the novel. The meaning of the Dead Zone was completely misunderstood, while such an important character as Greg Stillson was introduced at such a late stage, he might as well have been the postman.

I'd heard good things about the TV series, so when it started a repeat run tonight I looked forward to it enormously. After seeing one episode I feel so let down. Here was the chance to tell it like the book! What did they do? They killed off Johnny's parents, such important characters in the novel. Where was the wailing of his mother, or the good common sense of his father? There was no agonising by Sarah, instead. she marries the sheriff and they bring up a baby, presumably Johnny's, when in the novel Johnny and Sarah had never shared a bed!

When the original story is so good, why do movie makers and TV producers feel the need to change things? To my mind it's laziness in the extreme. It's small wonder that Stephen King is often frustrated by the way his books have been turned to film. I've only seen the first episode, but based on this I can only award it 2 out of 10.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dead End (I) (2003)
9/10
Horror with style, wit and charm
24 March 2005
When this movie started my heart sank a little. It's going to be another of those, "People in car take a wrong turn, encounter one sort of slasher or other." How wrong I was, and what a little gem this film is. True, the occupants of the car do take a wrong turn, Frank Harrington is taking his family and his daughter's boyfriend to spend Christmas with his in-laws, but there this movie parts company with your average gore-fest. This, I believe, is for three reasons. The writers gave the cast great lines to read; the blood content is actually very low for such a film, and finally, it was inspired not to fill the car with swinging teens, but use a mixture of youngsters and, shall we say, more mature citizens. I'll not go into plot lines, but if you're like me, this movie will leave you with a satisfied grin on your face.
138 out of 188 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Red Dragon (2002)
9/10
Forget Manhunter, this is the real deal.
15 May 2004
Ignore all the hype that says Manhunter and Brian Cox are the definitive Hannibal Lecter pairing. Red Dragon was always my favourite book of the Thomas Harris trilogy, and this version didn't disappoint. We were spared the cop-out ending of Manhunter and were treated to a faithful reproduction of the original novel. Cox is a fine actor, but pales in comparison to Anthony Hopkins. He's been likened to a cartoon character, but is he really that different to the Hannibal Lecter we first saw in Silence of the Lambs? Then, almost everyone agreed, his performance was ground-breaking. Now, they harp back to Manhunter, a decent enough film, but not in the same league as this version.

I'm sure Thomas Harris has now closed the Hannibal Lecter file and is wise in doing so. I feel in going out with Red Dragon, he's leaving on a high with probably the best of the Hopkins/Lecter movies. A strong nine out of ten.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed