PLOT: Three friends, all members of the king's Musketeers (personal guards) are joined by a young man who himself is seeking to become a Musketeer like his father once was. Together they try to foil a conspiracy hatched by the Cardinal to seize power from the young French king.
MOVIE OBJECTIVE: To take a rather well-known tale and target the massive demographic of young audiences for a commercial (rather than critical) success using tried and tested "Hollywood" ingredients worth $90 million. MANY compromises were made to meet this so if you're hoping the people behind this were going for overall QUALITY, leave now.
FOR: - People who don't mind that movies sell-out for commercial rather than critical success; - People who can part with $12 to get away for a couple of hours and just be "entertained" by sights and sounds; - Those who like the adventure genre or steampunk (Jules Verne/H.G. Wells-ish crazy imaginings and contraptions); - Those who can accept that it didn't take the novel seriously, therefore shouldn't be taken seriously itself
NOT FOR: - People wanting a "classy" movie or a "classic" adaptation of the book. This rendition is about as faithful as a prostitute. It will role-play for a while but from the beginning you will smell that it's nowhere near the real thing. And it won't give your money back!; - Literature purists. Yes, Alexandre Dumas is spinning right round like a record, baby; - People who will attempt to intellectualize the movie, its characters and their motives. STOP! This isn't a movie to get you to think, reflect or analyze anything. It just wants you to sit and watch; - People who won't be able to get past what it could have BEEN rather than just accepting what it IS and ISN'T
HITS: (or MISSES, Depending on your taste) - Casting a balance of recognizable and bankable names (Milla Jovovich as Milady, Orlando Bloom as the Duke of Buckingham) with skilled (Christoph Waltz as Richelieu) and convincing (Ray Stevenson as Porthos) actors; - Visual effects and scenery showing glimpses of castles, skies, Europe, places most folks don't get to see; - An element of Da Vinci; - A precarious duel scene; - Characters pumped up with superhero-like skills and abilities, if you're into that
MISSES: - Fails as an adaptation or period/historic piece (remember, ACCURACY is not among its objectives); - Reeking of anachronisms (too many to list!) and illogical elements. Yes, you MUST suspend your disbelief; - Some tepid action sequences tamed further by slow-motion shots that make you feel like doing away with the weaponry and just slapping each other to death would have been more brutal and satisfying (Seriously, a swordfight with hardly a drop of blood shed?); - Writing is weak and characters poorly developed. They give an overview to stamp the personalities and skills of each character in the opening scenes and that's it; - Acting is bland. Even Waltz couldn't squeeze out enough from his material to make Richelieu darker, devious, cunning, or evil. He should strike fear into your heart that will leave no doubt that crossing him would bring you severe pain and torture. Rather here, Jovovich's Milady probably just rolls her eyes at him with the expression we now universally recognize as, "Whatever!". As for the rest, Bah! - Neither the script, acting, nor direction would elicit your sympathy for any of the characters or their situations.
This is ultimately the saddest compromise. It is void of love or chemistry between two "lovers", you can't relate to anyone, you won't feel sorry for anyone betrayed, there is no sense of urgency nor anything to cheer for or clap for once "good" triumphs over "evil", and there is no camaraderie and bonding between the main protagonists that evokes "All for one, and one for all!" You got friends who would die or kill for you? Well, these guys don't seem like they'd leave a bar at happy hour to help the other in need. Three Musketeers only in tarnished name. More appropriately: Three and a Half Man- fighters, or Four Men and a (Mi)Lady.
BOTTOMLINE: This will work only if you're a casual movie-goer. It is flawed, unoriginal, lacking, and nowhere near the standard of the classic novel it was named after or even the standards for a "good" movie. If you can temper your expectations, you can salvage some entertainment value and maybe even like it enough to see it again on HBO. It is okay to watch on a big screen (cinema or home theater) for its visuals but not to shell out extra for 3D.
1 out of 4 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends