Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Midsomer Murders (1997– )
6/10
Well done but boring
29 August 2007
Midsomer Murders is like so much of the British television is - picturesque, charming fiction full of familiar actors, neat landscapes and excellent camera work. The characters always come from the upper middle classes, the poorer folks are local hermits living in garden sheds and even the policemen drive jaguars. As delightful as this series is to watch, it still lacks originality and spirit.

John Nettles still has some sexy charm about him, and that saves his character DCI Tom Barnaby. The main detective in this series is perfect and faultless to the fault, a man with no unsolved issues about him. He may be realistic, but a character realistic in this way just doesn't equal good fiction. Barnaby has a pretty home, homely little lady of a wife, a homely little lady of a daughter and a regularly changing sidekick of a younger detective. He is good-humoured, laid-back, not too intelligent and regularly overshadowed by the guest starring British actors, talented and charismatic as they always are.

The story lines are usually quite ornamental - murders occur during Spanish evenings, historical re-enactments, writers' fairs, summer solstices and film shootings; the violence or evil of death is ignored regularly as beautiful women make beautiful corpses laying on the green rolling hills of the home counties.

Delightful but not particularly fresh.
9 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Oddly uneven
23 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
THis movie is a sort of modernised version of the original Shakespeare play. From the scrip a lot of the loose text from the original play has been dropped out (and hence many of the characters have been marginalised), but those changes actually serve the text pretty well; even though it is delightful, Midsummer is not the Bard's best work and is in places outdated.

This adaptation has a nice basic idea. It has been transferred into early 20th century Tuscany, and Theseus has been made a local nobleman of high rank. Most of the scenes in this "real" world work well, even if the cast isn't ideal. Pair Strathairn/Marceau is spot-on and West/Friel works well too. Bale/Flockhart... not so sure about them. Kline as Nick Bottom is a bit over-the-top for my liking, and the rest of his merry men stuck behind his shadow.

In the fairy world, everything goes awry. The setting changes from the beautiful Italian countryside into cheap, badly done studio set. All the rather nice costumes are drowned by this mess of a surrounding. Of the actors, Pfeiffer is not too bad. Everett is a wonderful idea for Oberon, giving the role credibility and smoothness. Tucci...? Ah well. This is what happens when a character is detached entirely from what the writer had in mind. My idea of Puck never was that he is a wise, benevolent man.

All and all, this is not all bad but still rather sloppily done. The basic questions this play is probably intended to raise are not pressed forward as much as they could have done, but generally, this works as entertainment. But if you have got a college paper to write about this play, look for other sources.

I would give the movie a 6, and the extra point for David Strathairn, who never fails to get me going :D
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ambivalent
14 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Rating this movie I really wasn't sure what to give it. It has its downs, but also some spectacular ups. The setting is wonderful; Longbourne is beautiful in it's 17th century glory, the set for the Meryton assembly amazing and Chatsworth as Pemberley breathtaking. The music is beautiful. The costumes are at times extremely elegant.

But. The casting is slightly off. Keira Knightley is good, Rosamund Pike spot-on; I love Brenda Blethyn to death, but something about her is not quite right here. Matthew Macfadyen, perfect in Perfect Strangers, is more a contemporary face and lacks the kind of strength and sexy charm I associate to the role. The younger Bennett girls... Tallulah Riley is too pretty and the other two too childish. And Donald Sutherland - who thought casting him would be a good move? Also, the adaptation fails. The very basic storyline is there, and nothing else. The characters are oftentimes wrong, as are the dynamics of the family. Mr Collins and Mr Bingley are nothing like their literary counterparts, and Mr and Mrs Hurst have been deleted entirely. The Bennett family has been made much poorer than they are. The whole Wickham storyline is pushed aside too soon, as if the writers didn't know just how important it is. And so on... On the whole, I had the feeling that it was done in rush, and as short as possible.

Also, the movie is full of all sorts of modern blunders. Too many to mention.

I have heard that before being assigned to direct this film Joe Wright had never read the book; he didn't fully understand his subject, or the importance of portraying certain things faithfully to it, and that has given this work a slightly sour aftertaste.
1 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Silent Hill (2006)
1/10
I never...
12 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
...saw such a boring thing in my entire life. Never. I have seen hundreds of movies in my life and for the very first time, I actually wanted to sit up and leave. Only the friend I was with stopped me from doing so and in the end he hoped we had done it after all too.

I haven't played the game, but can actually believe that it might work out just fine. But as a movie, the game's plot line just simply doesn't work. When the DIY factor of a game is taken away, all you have is a group of people you really don't care about running around, performing tasks that are, when watched on a big screen, simple and pointless.

Instead of rising to a higher level, using the themes for something, this movie is simply a pre-solved run-through of a computer game. Task: a monster appears. Solution: shoot it, continue. Task: a hole on the floor. Solution: cross the hole balancing on the structures poking out of the hole. Task: monsters on the corridor. Solution: turn of your lantern and walk slowly past them. And so on. And so on. And so on. And soh...
46 out of 99 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Overrated
6 June 2006
When I first saw this film in cinema 11 years ago, I loved it. I still think the directing and cinematography are excellent, as is the music. But it's really the script that has over the time started to bother me more and more. I find Emma Thompson's writing self-absorbed and unfaithful to the original book; she has reduced Marianne to a side-character, a second fiddle to her much too old, much too severe Elinor - she in the movie is given many sort of 'focus moments', and often they appear to be there just to show off Thompson herself.

I do understand her cutting off several characters from the book, but leaving out the one scene where Willoughby in the book is redeemed? For someone who red and cherished the book long before the movie, those are the things always difficult to digest.

As for the actors, I love Kate Winslet as Marianne. She is not given the best script in the world to work with but she still pulls it up gracefully, without too much sentimentality. Alan Rickman is great, a bit old perhaps, but he plays the role beautifully. And Elizabeth Spriggs, she is absolutely fantastic as always.
32 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cake (I) (2005)
2/10
Boooriiing
21 May 2006
This movie was so boring I didn't know if I should cry or sleep.

The idea of an independent single girl took no wind at any point as this girl simply gave in to everything and everyone, instead of showing any of spunk and spirit she was supposed to have. I am not entirely sure what the message here was supposed to be - happiness lies in meringue wedding? The originality of the side-characters was expressed through their "weird" appearances. The "baddie" was a wedding-crazed spinster. The conflict? - non-existing. The characters didn't grow or learn, they simply gave in in front of the convention.

Uninspiring, and I'm afraid, very very American in its blind idolisation of the white-wedding bliss.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed