Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
The emperor has no clothes!
1 December 2009
It was absurdist, because it didn't make sense. It was over the top, and then some. That doesn't automatically make it a comedy.

For that it would need, what's that word again... oh yeah, humor! Which it didn't have. Because it wasn't funny. To me.

I went into the movie not knowing the genre, or who made it. I cringed at every cliché, and though it sometimes had the air of a spoof comedy, it was just so... off. The film's rhythm hurt my brain. And it felt like it lasted for ages.

So if that was the effect Herzog went for, he succeeded. A very accurate rendition of a crappy movie, bravo! The joke's on us, I guess. We must have deserved it somehow, you know we'll watch anything by you. And you must be a real artist if you can invoke such genuine emotions in your audience, like disgust and disappointment.

I gave it a 4 for getting such a great cast together, but I'd like at least 1 of those 2 hours back.
24 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Constantine (2005)
4/10
Waste of time!
4 May 2005
A lot has already been said about Keanu's inability to emote, in this film as well as his previous ones, so I'm not going to waste too much time on that subject. But it sure was a drag to see him 'act'. Again.

So that's one character I couldn't identify with at all. But I didn't feel much for any of the others either, and several times I found myself wondering why I was still watching.

It helped to learn on IMDb that this movie was based on a comic book series, so now at least I can understand how they could write such a fragmented script. It's just a very lousy conversion to the silver screen, that's trying to introduce too many characters without telling you their background, which probably took the comic book writers years to establish.

The CGI was alright, I guess, nothing that really blew me away despite all the simulated violence being blasted towards me.

I can find good things in most films I watch, but I wouldn't know how to advertise this thing to anyone.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Code 46 (2003)
8/10
Pleasing lack of visual noise
16 March 2005
I liked how the movie didn't scream at me, trying to deafen me with whatever kind of message the actors and director wanted to convey... I had to work a little bit to see what there was to be seen - which I like, and I found the lack of CGI and laser guns thoroughly refreshing. The pace was right, and the music fit the mood of the movie.

The movie as a whole has a distinct human quality like I used to enjoy in those 50's sci-fi stories the way Philip K. Dick could write them. The same atmosphere that's usually gone in Dick's flashy Hollywood rewrites.

The intercultural lingo is a lot of fun to listen to, it's not too tacky and not too overdone, it sounds almost natural to me.

All in all a good 8 out of 10 stars from me. If there was more of a puzzle to be solved throughout the film (it does have you wonder where things are going in the beginning) I would have probably rated it even higher, because I like my stories a little mysterious and not too straightforward. I can imagine that some people find the acting slightly too bland for their tastes, but I feel it's far better to err on the side of caution than to produce another vehicle for overacting and improbable characters.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Surprisingly refreshing *spoilers*
8 April 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Wow. I've seen a lot of 'alternate timeline' movies, and still this one didn't bore me one bit.

If I'd read any of the bad reviews here before seeing the movie, or looked at the rating demographics, I might have spent my time otherwise. Glad I didn't! Hence this comment to make up for some of the slaughter going on.

I did find it a bit too theatrical at times, grotesque maybe even, but not nearly as much as, say a Matrix trilogy or pretty much any Hollywood blockbuster that requires you to suspend your disbelief for over 90 minutes.

I'll praise this movie some more but I don't know how to do it without spoiling it. So...

*spoilers*

The plot seemed sound to me, pretty cohesive for a temporal mindbender. Ashton Kutcher might have looked a little closer at the character his younger versions were portraying. Still, not bad at all. It wasn't the easiest part to play, I suppose.

The kids in the movie did an excellent job. That li'l psycho Tommy character really freaked me out, bone-chilling! Both young Evans were brilliantly cast, and I'm confident we haven't seen the last of them on the big screen.

Yes, it was a tad lengthy but it offered enough different perspectives along the way to stay interesting. As for the ending, I had a feeling they'd show us you just can't win 'em all when traveling through time. So, unsatisfying or not, I guess it's a believable ending.

As for the ultra-violence, yes the movie shocked, so it didn't let me down. Since I chose to watch a thriller I got what I wanted out of it, and then some. Luckily, it wasn't graphic to the max - even though the plot allowed for an unwatchable snuff type depiction - but it was more than enough to get my synapses firing.

No regrets here, these were 2 hours well-spent!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Frailty (2001)
9/10
Not for the shallow minded or delusional *SPOILERS*
1 March 2004
Warning: Spoilers
*SPOILERS*

The ending's pretty spectacular, actually... After Adam slays his latest demon, we see FBI agents trying to figure out who that guy was visiting agent Doyle the other night. Agent #1 can't exactly remember his face, saying it's all a blur. The surveillance tape seems mysteriously damaged (the VHS noise exactly masks his face), so they follow the only lead they have and head for the village Doyle had checked out the info from earlier on in the movie. Agent #1 shows up at the sherriff's office, the lady that answered earlier inquiries by phone is there, and lo and behold, the sherriff is none other than Adam himself. The FBI agent has a Hitchcock type zoom effect happening to him and does not recognize him at all. He informs Adam about his 'brother', and Adam assures them he'll help any way he can. They shake hands, whereupon Adam tells the other he's a good man. No flashes of demonic nastiness. The agent leaves, confused. The girl walks up to him, real happy to hear that "god's will has been served" or something. (She's obviously a 'follower'.) The end.

Now, if you ask me, that whole last part, from the plot twist/brother perspective swap up to the end, is us looking at the whole story from Adam's point of view, who happens to be a delusional maniac, explaining Doyle's 'confession', the face blur, tape screw up and final handshake (which doesn't actually do anything except build upon the other 3 'evidences').

Otherwise, the director would be suggesting that as long as you're 'chosen', you're a superhero who can do anything he wants to combat whatever evil you are 'shown'. We're tempted to consider this possibility because Hollywood directors almost ALWAYS take the stinger out at the end, making sure you know big ol' mister movieguy was just kidding.

It's the total absence of this referential correction that makes for a truly freaky movie.

I read in someone else's review they renamed it 'the devil's hand' in Brazil. They just had to put it in perspective for the feeble minded... shame though, it's the lack of moral comment that I like about it. But I'm not delusional, most of the time.

Yet another reviewer pointed out that it's conveniently coincidental that a demon has been put on his case. That might just be the only clue to a moral comment in the entire 'Adam's view' part of the story. Because it's just too coincidental, and I have to conclude that outside of Adam's version of the story, in 'reality', he just wanted to wrap the whole thing up... His double identity as his long dead brother, the cellar filled with corpses, and most of all that annoying FBI agent that has devoted himself to his case. For Adam, the best way to get that man where he wanted to bury him, was to tell the side of the story Adam thinks Doyle will sympathize with.

I realize there may be people thinking that Adam only recently killed his brother, and/or that his older brother was another demon slaying loony, responsible for the corpses in the cellar. Or even, that Doyle was 'sent' to Adam, making the whole story commentless again. Just writing this makes me reconsider at least the first two options.

My own view just seems to add up more than the others, for me. Which could be unhealthy if I was delusional, right?

Needless to say i rate this baby a 9...
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed