Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Spectral (2016)
8/10
Great Concept, but Lacking Emotion or Suspense in the Ending.
12 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
To begin with, you should definitely watch this movie if you like sci-fi. It is an adequate combination of action and sci-fi tropes to make most sci-fi fans, such as myself, happy. The cinematography is fantastic and the set design is perfect. The monsters/ghost look cool. The prop design looks adequately futuristic without looking clunky or cheap. The effects, specifically the explosions, are very satisfying.

However, (and this is spoilery, for sure) the film doesn't really build up the former regime as hardcore bad guys, but more-so makes you assume all weapons research is fundamentally evil in order to drive the plot. Since most people have no basic idea of what weapons research might entail, basic fear and anxiety doesn't land enough to make this movie suspenseful. The science behind the "ghosts" in the film is not elaborated on, whatsoever, nor does the director include a scene showing how it may fundamentally work. So, there is a logical jump that makes the anti-ghost tech seem unreasonable. The absolute worst part of the movie, in my opinion, is the ending, which has no hook, no "to be continued", and just ends with a "thank you" from a Moldovan child that had experienced US troops invading her homeland, lost her father and brother to the creatures, and somehow ended up being buddy-buddy with complete strangers. The only foreshadowing of possible future complications comes from a CIA reclamation unit arriving to take the technology used to create the ghosts back to the US... something that the main character doesn't even react to, in spite of him previously being the token "anti-violence" character. Basically, this movie has either been aggressively edited down or basic parts of the story arc were unintentionally omitted, making the viewer feel a little cheated by the end.

I gave this an 8/10, because I love watching it, but really wish the story was fleshed out.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I'm awe
14 January 2007
I awoke early in the morning to by chance catch this particular movie. Or more so it caught me. This beautiful story of powerful love is quite the heart-wrenching story of tragedy, and in many ways a more powerful image of what you can endure for love, and what love can endure. If I can say nothing else, I would like to say I'm glad that I was allowed the opportunity to watch it. Ian McKellen as always created a spectacular character. His character, Kennedy, is the physician in the town that the main character Yanko washes up on. Kennedy is thoughtful and well presented. Another example of these magical characters within this story is Miss Swaffer, played by Kathy Bates. Its as if the people playing these character have a real love for the story, making them appear more than just two-dimensional figures, but real living breathing people.
15 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed