Change Your Image
lawsonlynn
Reviews
Spacey Unmasked (2024)
Group Therapy Take Down Piece
This 2 part series cannot be called a documentary. There is no balance, no desire to present the full story. The series is essentially a group therapy session where individuals who contend that they have been scarred for life, reveal their personal stories regarding sexual encounters with Kevin Spacey. The film barely notes that Spacey was acquitted of a crime in the only case that went to trial. Others tangentially acknowledge that Spacey's conduct, though offensive, never rose to the level of a crime. Several of the men were former marines or physically strong. Most of these men ultimately resisted Spacey.
It isn't that I don't have sympathy for these men who were obviously uncomfortable with Spacey. Most women understand exactly how they feel because most of us have experienced something similar at least once. Perhaps the point of this series was merely to include men (many of whom were apparently heterosexual) in the MeToo discussion.
While they appear to be sincere, they are presenting very private allegations within a forum where there is no insight or commentary from Spacey and no attempt whatsoever to add context or to question their accounts. One of the problems with MeToo accusers was that the media appeared to forget that there is a reason that we vet factual allegations before concluding that career ending allegations are always true and uncomplicated on face. In court, we call that "due process." We should never draw conclusions about something which affects a person's reputation and livelihood based solely on the account of a single complainant, even when there is more than one complaint against the same person. It appeared that the public had finally come around to that conclusion, in large part due to the defamation trial initiated by Johnny Depp against his former wife. Sometimes people simply lie. At other times, providing context causes a fact finder to draw a different conclusion than what would be drawn based on an unsubstantiated allegation. Another possibility is that a person who makes an allegation has overreacted, has misunderstood something or has even forgotten critical details due to the passage of time and a change of perspective. Regret about having participated in a lewd sexual encounter is not evidence of a crime.
Finally, when we are talking about adults - not children - some degree of discomfort in our personal lives is just part of life. We don't bring criminal charges against a man for being a "cold" lover or for merely asking a man or a woman out when that person is not interested. I noticed that in many of the stories told in this series, the men were excited to meet Spacey because they thought he could do something for them. They were happy to meet with him or even go to his hotel room at midnight in one case, because it was Kevin Spacey. One man said he was never afraid that Spacey would rape him but he understood that it was a "sell your soul" situation where the man was considering doing something that made him uncomfortable in exchange for Spacey helping him with his career. This man stopped the encounter and said "no" and left. Most of us would describe that as having integrity. These adult men may have felt awkward and afraid of offending Kevin Spacey but I wonder what Kevin Spacey would say? If they accepted his invitations after he had made his attraction to them known, was it unreasonable of him to assume that they were also interested? Maybe Spacey wanted to believe that people were actually interested in him or attracted to him and not merely interested in what they thought Spacey could do for them. Spacey appears to have a type- masculine men who are former marines and men who had greater physical strength than Spacey did.
The issue of the imbalance of power is always brought up in these stories. That just underscores the point that people often get into these situations because they intend to use the man with the power and/or they enjoy having access to that level of power, that level of wealth and prestige. In some cases, the man with the power has purchased homes, cars & jewelu for those who later accuse him. All of the men in this series with the exception of 2 - fully intended to take advantage of Spacey's status in order to benefit their careers. The exceptions included a former high school classmate.
It is not illegal for a man or a woman to attempt to initiate a sexual encounter. The act becomes criminal when someone says "no" and the act becomes an act of nonconsensual violence. Having regret about having participated in a sexual encounter is also not evidence that a crime occurred.
Spacey's brother participated in what appears to be an unfinished interview, from which clips are intermixed with the stories. He offers a glimpse into their childhood and regarding their abusive and Nazi loving father. I was struck by the similarities between the description of Spacey's father and the character in American Beauty named "Colonel Frank Fitts" (brilliantly portrayed by the actor, Chris Cooper).
After watching both episodes, I felt like I had read something out of a tabloid but produced in video. I don't blame the men who offered their stories. I have no reason to believe any of them were lying about how they felt. I did feel as if none of this was any of my business. I was also uncomfortable about the fact that such embarrassing personal details could become "entertainment" for others to profit from, without the consent of the person whose career is being ruined and cancelled as a result. None of this had anything to do with Kevin Spacey's acting career. I am capable of separating "the art" from "the artist" and I wish we could return to such a place.
Johnny Handsome (1989)
35 Years Later, I Loved this Film
I watched "Johnny Handsome" for the first time 35 years after its release. The exceptional main cast includes Mickey Rourke, Elizabeth McGovern, Morgan Freeman, Forrest Whitaker & Ellen Barkin. The setting is the seedy side of New Orleans.
Mickey Rourke plays the lead character, John, who is mockingly referred to as "Johnny Handsome" because of his deformed and hideous facial features. The real Mickey Rourke was, of course, gorgeous in 1989. Following radical facial and cosmetic surgery to John, with his dubious consent while recovering from stab wounds sustained while he is serving time for botched armed robbery, John's new face is revealed to be that of a young, handsome Mickey Rourke. John is given a new identity and granted parole. The doctors and nuns view the new and improved John optimistically. They have given him a chance for redemption and as handsome as he is following surgery, they are confident that he will succeed. Johnny has had a rough life so far. His mother was a prostitute who abandoned him. His father is unknown. He has also been tormented by others for having a hideous face and speech impediment. The detective working the case (played by Morgan Freeman) remains skeptical that Johnny will be able to change who he is. As a result of the botched robbery job, Johnny's best friend was also killed by the con who double crossed them and ended up owning the friend's bar after his death.
It is impossible for the viewer not to be hopeful for Johnny after he is revealed to appear as Mickey Rourke. Young Mickey Rourke had the ability to draw us in and believe he was real - whether he had magically transformed from hideous monster to handsome young man or he was working for the devil in Angel Heart. Johnny has a chance for a real life, once he receives early parole. He is now truly handsome, he has a job and he meets Donna (played by Elizabeth McGovern) who appears to accept him for who he is. She makes him appear to be good and normal and claims that his eyes (which have remained unchanged) are what she loves most about his face.
Throughout the film, the detective (Freeman) shadows and taunts Johnny, reminding him of who he is and assuming that Johnny will be unable to live the life of a normal man with the face of Mickey Rourke.
We soon learn that Johnny intends to exact revenge upon Rafe and Sunny (the crooks who double crossed Johnny and killed his friend. "Sunny" is convincingly played by Ellen Barkin who was clearly having fun with this role). Unrecognizable Johnny approaches them under the guise of executing a lucrative gig. While it is clear through his actions that Johnny genuinely cares about Donna (McGovern), he ultimately distances himself from her for her own good as he proceeds with his plan. Ultimately, his affection for Donna complicates matters. Without spoiling the plot completely, I will just say that it turns out that Johnny is doomed to complete the journey he was on before his identity change. While he had the potential for a better life, a new face could not erase the past. Those who had believed in Johnny and believed he would succeed, were simply incapable of understanding the darkness within him. A new face could never save him from himself. Whether this is true because of people like the Detective who continued to remind him or because he simply had unfinished business is left for the audience to decide. It is notable that when the bandages were first removed, Johnny told the doctor that he still felt like he was wearing a mask. Either way- a face would always be a mask. A handsome face was simply more compelling. But what doors might be opened for that reason is another question the audience is left to contemplate.
I wasn't expecting to like this movie as much as I did. I highly recommend it.
Blue Valentine (2010)
Compelling Illustration of How Even "True Love" May Die
Do not watch this film if you are looking for a happy ending or even a therapeutic cry. This film addresses the burning question of how 2 people who appear to be so utterly wrong for each other in the present ever got together in the first place. In so doing, the Director and the stars (Gosling & Williams) masterfully reveal through flashbacks the history of a relationship between spouses who in the present, appear to have nothing in common. In the most compelling accounting of a "marriage gone wrong"I have ever seen displayed on film, the audience is transported back in time to the circumstances which so sweetly and perfectly brought these two people together. The audience sees 2 delightful and beautiful people who appeared to have had everything necessary for a long and happy marriage before the marriage began. Initially, Gosling's character is full of life, lovable, adorable, fun loving, musically talented- and completely in love. While Williams' character continues to evolve over time, continues to set goals, to aim higher, to better herself, etc., she ultimately realizes that her husband will never be more than what he was before she married him. From Dean's perspective, marrying her was "the win" and all he could ever hope for. Once married, Dean saw no reason to change anything. Once married, through his wife's tired eyes, the qualities in Dean which had first appeared charming and lovable, now looked more like inertia, immaturity and a failure to thrive. While I wanted to root for the marriage to continue at times, I understood why it could not. The relationship had died and could not be resuscitated. While Williams' character appeared to genuinely care about her husband's well being because he had not always been a day drinking imbecile, she simply could not overcome her contempt for his failure to become a productive and interesting adult. She was also angry with herself for becoming an enabler, rather than one who insisted upon more.
This movie affected me deeply. I had trouble getting it out of my head long after I watched it. In that sense, it accomplished what it set out to do. The story behind the story is best illustrated by the actors who apparently lived together in order to provide a more convincing portrayal of a marriage. If that is something you are interested in, this movie is really something. I recommend it for anyone who is interested in unraveling the mysteries of a marriage and/or for those who may be struggling to decide whether to remain married. Obviously, it is not necessary to have any agenda in order to appreciate a good story and great acting. Blue Valentine is a fine work of art. But to reiterate, if you are looking for a "feel good" ending or an affirmation of love, this movie will be a bitter pill to swallow. If I had to guess, I am also pretty sure that is also the point.
Barbie (2023)
Worth Watching for the Visuals & the Conversation
Almost everyone should watch this movie, if for no other reason, to be part of the conversation. The topic of this movie often comes up in conversation and it is impossible to adequately summarize or explain the movie to anyone who has not seen it. "The world of fantasy and make believe meets reality" is not a unique narrative device but this film is unique in its approach to gender and unique in how it turns the "Barbie" stereotype on its head.
Career driven women have often mocked the Barbie stereotype. Others have expressed contempt for it. The movie makes the point that in Barbie land, women can do anything and Ken is merely an accessory.
As stereotypical Barbie (perfectly played by Margot Robbie) enters the portal to the real world (driving her Barbie mobile with Ken tagging along), Ken quickly realizes that men are in charge in the real world. Ken then promotes his naive understanding of "stereotypical patriarchy" which initially empowers him in a way he has never experienced in Barbie land.
Ultimately, there is a clash of worlds, with once high powered Barbies (like "President Barbie") becoming accessories and merely ornamental in the patriarchy established by Ken in what becomes "Kendom." These Barbies claim that being ornamental is fun and are diagnosed by "Weird Barbie" (the Barbie who was played with too much, played by Kate McKinnon) as being "brainwashed. The human females, Weird Barbie & stereotypical Barbie set out to restore Barbieland to its former glory by taking the power back from the Kens who are portrayed as less intelligent than the Barbies. Ultimately, stereotypical Barbie and the humans realize that gender roles are complicated and that what matters is that everyone is true to herself. They also realize that the Kens should also be free to define themselves- not just in relation to the Barbies.
There appears to be an effort to acknowledge that men and women do not have to be in conflict with each other and that life is messy.
The set, the colors, the Barbie references are all worth watching. Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling are perfectly cast. There are some funny lines and scenarios. I appreciated the perspective of Barbie who can do anything in a world where women rule in contrast to the modern criticism of Barbie as representing a female stereotype which damages young girls. Ultimately, it was not clear to me what message the film was attempting to promote. Certainly, there have been plenty of films where the men were the smarter, more interesting characters so perhaps, this film aimed to balance that out. There is also an acknowledgment that life is complicated and that we should love and respect each other.
Saltburn (2023)
The Trailer may be better than the Movie (very mild spoilers)
This movie was grossly over hyped. While I enjoyed parts of it - particularly the scenes with Rosamund Pike and/or Jacob Elordi, I found stretches of the film to be quite monotonous and uninspired. This is a movie about really terrible people, none of whom are redeemable, with the possible exception of Rosamund Pike's character, Elspeth Catton. She is a judgmental snob who ultimately finds comfort in what she naively believes is a show of genuine compassion and affection.
Barry Keoghan plays the lead role in the character, Oliver Quick. He is well cast as this sometimes difficult to read character. He pulls off both innocence and connivance. I must also commend the actor for having the courage and confidence to dance completely naked-revealing all. Perhaps this is a credit to his Irishness. I cannot think of a single American actor who has allowed himself to be so exposed on the big screen.
There are some graphic scenes including one with menstrual blood and another involving sexual gratification from the dirt of a freshly covered gravesite. Such scenes appear to exist for their shock value without serving any particular narrative purpose. Perhaps I am simply shockproof at this stage of my life but the movie underwhelmed me. Jacob Elordi is gorgeous and charming and Rosamund Pike continues to impress and entertain me with the life she brings to every character she plays. It is impossible to forget her, especially when she is both terrible and somehow lovable.
Given the hype and award nominations from this film, it is worth watching and there really are some interesting scenes. I had high expectations but unfortunately, the movie failed to entice me throughout.
Maestro (2023)
The Music Told the Story
Before watching "Maestro," I was puzzled by some of the reviews which appeared to be mocking Bradley Cooper for taking this on. While I have learned to judge films for myself, having disagreed with the critics on several films in the last decade, the attacks on Cooper reminded me of the attacks on Barbra Streisand years ago when she was mercilessly attacked for being "a diva" when she was actually a "perfectionist" who wanted to get everything right.
"Maestro" focuses on the relationship between Leonard Bernstein and his wife Felicia, with whom he shared 3 children. We are first introduced to a young Bernstein with his male lover on the occasion of his big break as a conductor. Felicia is introduced as a sophisticated artist herself (never innocent or naive) and as someone who is philosophical about her choice of a mate. She genuinely loves and respects Lenny. She rationally concludes that if she removes the guilt from the equation and permits her husband to continue having affairs with men (as long as he is discrete and doesn't embarrass her), their marriage will succeed. Over time, as Lenny becomes sloppy and indiscreet, Felicia blames herself for believing that she could survive on what her husband could give her. Carey Mulligan compellingly inhabits Felicia and the chemistry with Bradley Cooper's Lenny is undeniable. The fact that this film has been blessed and praised by the real adult children born of the Lenny/Felicia union leads me to conclude that the actors have been true to both the marriage and to the characters they have portrayed.
Leonard Bernstein is such a legend that it would be impossible to condense every aspect of his life to fit a single film. Cooper's decision to tell the story of Bernstein's marriage and to portray Bernstein as a loving husband and father against the backdrop of his musical compositions makes for another work of art in "Maestro," while also humanizing Bernstein. Because Cooper et al had secured from the family, the rights to use the music, the music in the film is a narrative device. Some of the most compelling scenes contain no dialogue, including a recreation of Bernstein conducting the performance of Mahler's Resurrection Symphony at Ely Cathedral (filmed at Ely Cathedral). Scenes between Lenny and Felicia are interwoven with scenes from "On the Town," "West Side Story" and others. Maestro celebrates and upholds the music and the importance of art, the journey of the tormented artist and how art comes to be. This movie also examines "what goes on behind closed doors" in a marriage and what it means to love another human, while both upholding the institution of marriage and challenging many of its traditional underpinnings.
While we should be able to separate the art from the artist, there is little doubt that it is the complicated experience of living and of responding to pain, of searching for beauty in darkness, that produces the art which lives on long after the artist has passed. Bernstein's musical compositions came together when he was focused and alone but he was apparently a man who disliked, and even feared, being alone. Felicia is ultimately torn between her genuine respect and appreciation for "the art" and the legacy of her husband and the man who was her husband. After a short separation, the parties reconcile. Felicia sees that "summer" still sings in Lenny and Bernstein completely devotes himself to his wife during her illness and impending death at 56 from lung cancer. (Note: both Felicia & Lenny Bernstein were heavy smokers which is also depicted in this movie).
While Bernstein lived another 12 years after his wife died, and spent that time living as a gay man, the movie wraps up its story (without denying any of that) in the final scene. An older Bernstein confirms that "summer" still "sings" within him and in the music. We then see an image of Felicia, making it clear that Bernstein continued to be inspired and guided by their true and lasting love.
Hunt Club (2022)
I don't even know how to rate this
I am convinced this movie is meant to be humorous. I am also wondering whether Mickey Rourke took the job as a favor to someone else. I had read that Mena Suvari had been through a rough time -having overcome a struggle with addiction. Perhaps, she merely needed to get back to work. Perhaps she owed a favor to others in this production (filmed in Mississippi-another strange aspect of this film). Something tells me that the backstory would be more more entertaining than the movie.
All I can really say is that the movie is entertaining enough and stars 2 very accomplished actors in Mena Suvari and Mickey Rourke. I would not pay extra to watch it but it was available as part of my regular Prime subscription. No one should take this movie very seriously.
The Whale (2022)
I wanted to like this
First of all, this movie is simply too long. I could not get through all of it the first time I watched it. I kept getting up to do other things. I made myself watch the whole movie the following day.
As others have said, Brendan Fraser does a fine job. He is the best part of the movie. His character (Charlie) is nonetheless pathetic. He has given up on life and is in the process of eating himself to death. Before he dies, he reaches out to his terrible daughter and essentially bribes her to spend time with him.
The main theme of the movie is honesty. Charlie teaches a writing course via ZOOM while concealing his face from the students. The entire movie takes place in Charlie's dingy apartment. That the screenplay was adapted from a play is obvious. We learn that Charlie left his wife and daughter years earlier for another man who ended up taking his own life. Charlie lives in a state of shame and mourns the loss of his lover who was also made to feel shame for being gay by a religious cult. Charlie sees his awful daughter as "amazing" because she is honest. Her actions are viewed by everyone else as horrible and she is quite mean to everyone around her but Charlie admires her honesty and sees that quality as more important than any other. He frequently reads an essay his daughter had previously written (provided to him by her alcoholic mother who has denied him access to their daughter) about Moby Dick in which she writes that the author merely wrote this to distract us from his pathetic life. Charlie loves this essay because his daughter had the courage to be so honest and presumably, Charlie agrees with his daughter that much of what we are expected to do is b.s. ("the whale" serves as both a description of Charlie and a reference to the character of "Moby Dick" and the sense of consuming and being consumed by something). His final assignment to his students is to forget the required material and just "write something honest."
I really wanted to like this movie but it was painful to watch, it was too long and everyone in the movie was miserable. Presumably, we are supposed to take from this that guilt and shame are destructive (particularly what comes from religion which caused Charlie's lover to take his own life) and that we should just be true to ourselves and stop pretending to follow certain rules and expectations.
He's Just Not That Into You (2009)
Superb Cast; Utterly Insulting Message
As a big fan of the original "Sex and the City" series, I remember the episode when some wise stranger informed Miranda that a guy she had been out with and was fretting over just wasn't that "in to her." Miranda experienced an epiphany as a result of having been the recipient of this sage line, finding comfort in the simplicity of the message.
While SATC was about female empowerment, and women having the capacity to experience sex as nonchalantly & as detached as men do (with many caveats & exceptions which defined the series), this particular movie is an insult to women because the underlying message is that women are powerless and must be content to wait for men to respond. Women in this world are incapable of independent thought and action. Women are inherently reactive; their actions are based entirely upon how the men in their lives decide the various relationships should proceed. Men control all aspects of heterosexual coupling in "He's Just Not That Into You."
The main character of this movie, Gigi- played by Ginnifer Goodwin - is so desperate for a man to like (never mind "love") her that she is willing to subject herself to the most humiliating circumstances imaginable. She routinely and desperately calls upon the far too self important "Alex" (played by Justin Long) to advise her regarding the vapid men she encounters because she is too childlike to determine for herself that these men are useless and wrong for her. Alex - an underwhelming character and barely average in the looks department, fancies himself as a "player" while the far more attractive Gigi pitifully and desperately longs for the attention of any man, including the men who in real life would likely regard Gigi as someone "out of THEIR league." Gigi embodies a cringeworthy performance, so desperate for attention that she has been rendered utterly helpless in matters of basic human interaction and communication.
"He's Just Not That Into You" is as misogynistic of a romp as its title suggests. Women are either vapid & helpless, useless, needy & uninteresting OR they are neurotic shrews who repel everyone in their wake. Meanwhile, the men are free spirited and fun, deserving of their naughty dalliances. Women waste countless hours obsessing over how to capture and tame those spirits by marrying and destroying them. Marriage is portrayed as the prison from which all men trapped within it - and only the men- seek to escape.
Amazingly, this movie boasts of a star studded cast -Bradley Cooper, Ben Affleck, Jennifer Connelly, Jennifer Aniston, Scarlet Johansson, Drew Barrymore. Kris Kristofferson is even in this movie, along with of course, Gennifer Goodwin, Justin Long, Kevin Connelly, Busy Phillips and many others who provide meaningful support. I have no idea why that is the case but the cast is the best part of this flick. Honorable mention goes to a scene in a home improvement store where married couple, Ben and Janine (portrayed by Bradly Cooper and Jennifer Connelly) discuss floor samples and "real wood." On a more positive not, for those of us who are comfortable in our own skins, watching this movie can be an amusing experience- if only to marvel at how self-absorbed and ridiculous Justin Long's "Alex" & most of the other male characters appear to be. This movie also has all of the makings of a good drinking game. The writers and producers of this movie should be ashamed but based upon the attitudes displayed by the lead characters, the folks behind this film appear to be quite pleased with themselves. Watching this movie with a defiant (and perhaps drunken) attitude could actually be fun- I certainly recommend that approach. In any event, no one should take any of this seriously.
Night Walk (2019)
Young Director not intimidated by complicated subject & experienced actors
Mickey Rourke was right to accept this role. (His decisions about which roles to take have been questioned by others for years but more often than not, he remains true to himself & his principles). Anyone who enjoyed the prison drama, "Oz," will appreciate the gritty backdrop which colors this film. The movie received the Best Screenplay award for Asia Tazi (then only 28 years old) and the Best Actor award for Mickey Rourke at the 2019 Prague Independent Film Featival. This film is not a "feel good," or watered down romp, "for fun." It contains raw commentary whilch challenges stereotypes regarding the Arab and Muslim communities balanced out by a narrative of forbidden love and the injustice perpetrated upon the young white man who unwittingly lands in the midst of a culture & theological war. Worth the effort (unless the viewer's sole motivation for watching is to be entertained- no judgment- just want folks to know what they are getting in to).
Nine 1/2 Weeks (1986)
Much more than Sex
I have watched 9 1/2 weeks many times over the years. The first time, I watched it because I had heard it was steamy and of course, Mickey Rourke had never been more gorgeous. Before the film was even released, American censors and critics attempted to destroy it -much as they did with "Angel Heart." 9 1/2 weeks was a sensation in Europe long before American audiences finally discovered it on video. The movie initially bombed at the American box office but ran for 2 years in France and was a big hit with European audiences before many Americans even knew who Mickey Rourke was. Rourke's "leading man" status was sealed as a direct result of this film.
By the standards of today, 9 1/2 weeks is surprisingly tame. Reportedly, Basinger owns footage which did not make the final cut & which was deemed to be too psychologically damaging for mainstream audiences. Both Director Adrian Lyne & Rourke initially conceived of a darker production- to rival "Last Tango in Paris," but Basinger was not comfortable with that (and so, as Rourke joked, they ended up with a "Riunite commercial"). There are now 2 versions of the film available for viewing. However, even the "uncut" release is far less controversial than the puritanical MPAA of the '80s wished us to believe.
This movie certainly has its "sexy" moments but this is not merely a "skin flick." The acting, directing & editing are all top notch. The larger narrative is also worth note. While Rourke's "John Gray" has been called the "original" Mr. Gray (with "50 Shades"' "Christian" being a cheap imitation- so the comparisons go), and the dynamic within the relationship of the lead characters is one of power & submission, Basinger's Elizabeth is in no way pathetic and ultimately, she reclaims herself and her sexuality.
It is difficult to review this film without literally spoiling it but there are many reasons to watch it, including its representation of driving cultural forces in the '80s. The narrative explores a particular relationship while raising questions about human sexuality & relationships in general. The "refrigerator scene" in which Rourke's character feeds Basinger the contents of her refrigerator, must be viewed to be appreciated. That is really true of the entire movie.
The fact that just about everyone has at least heard of 9 1/2 Weeks (around the world) says a great deal about the wisdom of the younger Rourke's casting choices. Rourke has confirmed that even now, almost every week, someone still asks him about this movie.
The Power of the Dog (2021)
Undeserved Hype
What a disappointment. I loved Jane Campion's "The Piano." When I read the glowing reviews for "Power of the Dog, I naturally assumed- with the critics universally collapsing in ecstasy - that this film must be really something. As an added bonus, I was able to watch it on Netflix BEFORE the Oscars.
Then, I watched the movie. Once it was finally over, I wondered aloud, "Did I watch the wrong movie?" For starters, this movie -meant to undermine the myth of masculinity and the great American West - was filmed entirely on location in NEW ZEALAND. Refined British actor Benedict Cumberbatch plays a roughneck cowboy in this unbelievably depressing and boring flick. Anyone interested in a movie which explores the conflicts & self-destruction of American cowboys who don't want anyone else to know they are gay should watch "Brokeback Mountain." (That Heath Ledger was Australian was immaterial; "Brokeback" was simply better at this, in addition to being a great movie).
I disliked "Power of the Dog" immensely and question whether the critics had even seen the movie at all. Ultimately, I was also angry. Everything about this production (including the undeserved reviews and multiple Oscar nominations), reeks of the kind of tone deaf self-indulgence so many of us have come to loath, particularly during a pandemic. The purpose of the movie is apparently to make the audience miserable as if the average person would spend good money to merely squirm in his seat and be lectured to by a New Zealander about the evils of American "toxic masculinity." Campion essentially seeks to de-romanticize John Wayne while scolding us for wanting to be entertained. What's not to love?
The only reason I would recommend watching this movie is to be better informed about the type of crap which qualifies for recognition in Hollywood these days .
A Prayer for the Dying (1987)
Rourke knew what he was doing
Mickey Rourke deserves more credit than he has ever received for remaining true to himself & to his art during the years of his stardom during the 1980s. Too many assumed that he cared as much about his face as the rest of Hollywood did. Rourke was largely misunderstood during those years. He was less a trouble maker than a romantic who was disappointed in the world.
I digress. "A Prayer for the Dying" is the story of a man, for whom there has been "too much killing," a man in search of a better life. Rourke credibly portrays the dangerous and skilled hit man while also credibly portraying a man in search of redemption and a man who refuses to kill again.
There are other strong performances and Rourke's scenes with the priest's blind niece are authentically tender, representative of who the character of Martin Fallon could have been.
Side note: In at least 4 of Rourke's movies, a carnival has been part of the backdrop- this one, "Homeboy," "Angel Heart" (Coney Island/fortune tellers) and "The Wrestler" (the scenes with Randy & his daughter at what appears to be an abandoned carnival/boardwalk area on the beach). I assume these scenes are meant to convey feelings associated with a lost childhood or a longing for innocence. That would make sense in this movie where there is a sense that Martin had been born into a world of violence. He probably never had a childhood & Rourke depicts the character's journey of self discovery as somewhat childlike - as if he is asking the big questions about life & love for the first time.
Francesco (1989)
Rourke looms large in inspiring & largely forgotten role
I am beginning to realize that film critics who told audiences what to watch & what to overlook had far too much power prior to the internet and the digital streaming age. In 1989 when "Francesco" was released in Italy, most Americans had never even heard of it and by this time, Hollywood had grown exasperated with Rourke for refusing to play by its rules- and for rejecting roles which would have likely cemented Rourke's star power at the time (Rain Man, Pulp Fiction come to mind). What is truly jarring is to watch Rourke's beautiful and moving portrayal of the man who became a Catholic saint (an artistic & purposeful film) & then to watch Rourke's affable, but frivolous, ride in "Harley Davidson & the Marlboro Man" released the following year. Although Rourke's teaming with Don Johnson enjoys an enthusiastic cult following now, Rourke has publicly denounced "Harley" and admitted that he only accepted the part for the paycheck. Rourke has stated that doing that movie ("Harley") was the final straw in his self destruction and decision to return to boxing at the age of 39. One must only watch Rourke writhing -naked- in the snow because he has been "tempted" by desires of the flesh or gaze upon his look of ecstasy before dying, knowing that he is blessed because he bears the marks of the crucifixion, and the marks of Christ himself - to find context for the self-loathing for having "sold out" by lending his name & face to a production he did not respect (as "Harley Davidson").
Whether the choice to cast any American actor in the title role of this very European production was controversial or not at the time, I have no idea because I was not even aware the film existed until many years later when I became more interested in the career and life of Mickey Rourke. In order to understand Rourke's interest in and commitment to Francesco, it is important to note a few things. First of all, Rourke has never shied away from stating that he has always preferred other countries to his own and in fact, at least 2 of the movies Rourke is best known for - "Nine and 1/2 Weeks" & "Angel Heart," were seen as too intense/risqué by American censors. Both films were box office bombs in the U. S. but Nine and 1/2 Weeks was such a huge success in Europe that it apparently played in theaters for 2 years in France. Rourke became a bigger star in Europe than he was in his own country. Therefore, it makes sense that Rourke would have preferred working with an Italian production (rather than "Hollywood" which he had grown to loathe by this time) and it makes sense that an Italian production would seek to cast him. Secondly, Rourke was - and remains- a devout Catholic who has relied upon his Catholic faith and the support of his priest (now deceased) to get through a very dark period in his life. Finally, Rourke was & still is, a man who seeks meaning in life - and in death- and thus, his portrayal of a man who renounced his earthly possessions and wealth, to become a man of purpose, a man of God in beggar's clothes is quite compelling. Although the other actors - including a young Helena Bonham Carter- are mainly British or Italian, the dialogue is in English (not Italian) and Rourke often communicates emotion using only the expressions on his face. Young Rourke had a soft voice, appropriate for this role, and at almost every age, Rourke has been a presence on screen, often as a man of few words.
I will leave the plot summaries to the religious scholars because this is a historical drama which also received several awards. The film begins with Francisco's death. The story of his life is then told by his followers and friends through flashbacks & vinaigrettes. The real Francesco was born into wealth and has been described as an attractive man who enjoyed fine silks. Rourke credibly depicts Francesco as a man of privilege who renounced wealth & desires of the flesh to connect with God (the "father" who replaces his). Because Rourke himself comes from far more humble circumstances, he is equally convincing in his humility after he takes vows. Francisco's conscious choice to give up the privileges of wealth & physical beauty are made more compelling by the gorgeous & charismatic Rourke who credibly embodies the role of a lover who could have had any woman he desired and a man of status who could have continued to live comfortably (having remained his father's pride & joy until his father's death).
For anyone who is a Rourke fan, this movie illustrates his capacity for providing layers & depth. Although I am not Catholic, I was raised within a devoutly Christian family which often causes me to view "Christian" historical dramas with skepticism. I was genuinely moved by the sincerity of the portrait of a man who finds peace & a connection to God after witnessing the horrors of war & poverty and coming to understand that the things which had provided him with pleasure had also separated him from God and his higher purpose. There is also a wonderful scene involving a young lamb & group of hungry followers (hint: the lamb is not slaughtered).
For those who prefer the Mickey Rourke of "Get Carter" or "Double Team," this film may not be your cup of tea. There is incidental nudity. There are no graphic or simulated sex scenes but Rourke strips down a couple of times as do others for symbolic, spiritual purposes. There is also a view of the war dead & a mass grave. This is not an action thriller but the film's narrative is humbly & thoughtfully recited and its effect- uplifting. I had to watch the movie twice (within 2 days) to fully appreciate it.
Angel Heart (1987)
It took about 20 years for this masterpiece to escape the artistic prison of the MPAA
I was a college student when Angel Heart came out. I was also living in the American South where most folks went to church on Sunday and if they watched a movie like "Angel Heart," they kept that experience to themselves. I remember the movie in the context of its release, more for the revulsion it caused than anything else. I knew that the movie was "bad" because one of the main characters was the devil & because the film had stolen the virginity of Lisa Bonet in spectacular fashion. I also remember disparaging comments about "bad boy" Mickey Rourke who was proven to be "bad" for merely starring in this "bad" movie.
Fast forward through many years of my adulthood, through the shattering of the religious & cultural boundaries which once stunted my artistic growth- I have now watched "Angel Heart" 3 times and plan to watch it again because it is impossible to fully appreciate the attention to detail in this film by only watching it once. Since first watching the film in the '80s when it was released, I have also become a big Mickey Rourke fan & have watched/listened to several interviews with Rourke & Director Alan Parker, including interviews from the movie set & interviews done many years later. It has taken me many years to appreciate what a spectacular movie this is. Both Rourke & De Niro are at the top of their games. Particularly interesting, is the back story between the actors. De Niro was the bigger movie star, but Rourke was every bit his match & according to Parker, came to the set each day, determined to prove his worth as an actor, and prove his worth to De Niro who was less invested in that exercise. Parker described their scenes together as "like a boxing match" where both actors would veer off script, in their attempts to outdo each other. Ultimately, although De Niro's performance is flawless, this was Mickey Rourke's movie and in another era or in another world, Rourke would have been nominated for the highest honors for his portrayal of the lead, Harold Angel.
"Angel Heart" is everything a movie should be- great acting, great editing, sound, shot entirely on location in both New York & New Orleans. This movie terrifies, keeps us interested & above all, this movie has withstood the test of time and is actually better today than it was in 1987. How many movies which have won Academy Awards for "best picture" over the years are quickly forgotten? "Angel Heart" has taken its permanent place in history, culture & cinema.
Homeboy (1988)
Beautifully done
I watched this movie because I am a Mickey Rourke's fan. I was also curious about the chemistry between Rourke and Debra Feuer, Rourke's first wife, who appears as his love interest in Homeboy. While I am not a boxing fan, I was also curious to see a movie for which Rourke had also written the screenplay (as "Sir Eddie Cook").
Rourke absolutely nails the performance of Johnny Walker, a shy country boy who is emboldened by whiskey and the excitement of the boxing ring. Along the way, we begin to understand that Johnny is either drinking on the job or suffering from brain damage (or both) which causes blurry vision. Johnny comes off as a bit strange but he is mostly shy. He is part fighter/part romantic, attracted to assertive, capable women (the parallels with the life of the real Mickey Rourke are obvious). Johnny falls for the character played by his first wife- an assertive, independent, naturally beautiful woman who loves horses & bikes.
This movie really caught me off guard in its artistic vision, particularly in the display and depth of emotional expression and empathy from Rourke who wrote this in his 20s or 30s, apparently. (He told his costar Christopher Walken, about the script, apparently, when they met on the set of "Heaven's Gate," almost 10 years prior to starring together in "Homeboy.").
Through the character and narrative of Johnny/"Homeboy," this film explores themes of youth & innocence, survival, and what drives a man to keep living, to maintain hope for a beautiful life. There is a bit of a deceit in first introducing us to Johnny- as if we are meant to view him as one dimensional, boring, simple. As the film progresses, it is impossible not to be drawn in by Johnny's complexity- that is, the jarring contrast between Johnny's authentic tenderness and what drives him to fight, even when he knows he may die from it. We even sympathize with Christopher Walker's character- a criminal who was abandoned as a child. While there is an underlying narrative based upon a fighter who is too old to be the best there is & too young to be satisfied with his professional accomplishments, this film also tells a story about finding meaning & beauty in the context of unrelenting ugliness. Finally, the music by Eric Clapton deserves recognition for perfectly reflecting and linking the moments it follows.
Echoes (2022)
Loved this
I am getting a bit tired of reviews which begin with, "too complicated" or "lost me." Are we really becoming so lazy & impatient that we can't handle the occasional narrative challenge? "Not realistic" or "believable" is another common critique. Really? Because (news flash) no movie or series is "real." Isn't that the point? That we watch these things to escape reality & to be entertained.
I will admit that I was a bit disoriented at the conclusion of the 1st episode but unless the viewer is especially dense, it is not difficult to reorient & follow the narrative twisted by a set of twins who once vowed to share everything. I am not a fan of spoilers so I will just say that I enjoyed this so much that I binge watched the entire series because it was just like reading a really good book- I could not put this one down until it was over.
I read that there is no season 2 but that is ok by me. The ending did not disappoint.
Skin Traffik (2015)
Mickey Rourke, Eric Roberts & Darryl Hannah - not the "Pope" reunion I was hoping for
When I realized a movie had come out in 2015 which counted as members of its cast- Rourke, Roberts & Hannah, I decided to go for it. I took a chance on a movie I had never heard of. This movie is about as different from "The Pope of Greenwich Village," as any film could be. The star of this movie is an actor I was not familiar with who plays the role of a hit man - so deluded that he believes his mission has been to do "good" in the world - at least until he began asking hard questions. You should take the title, "Skin Traffik," to mean exactly what you think it means. The main characters differ in how they relate to said, "traffik," and the varying degrees of moral relativism each of them possesses. A missed opportunity with this cast.
Unfaithful (2002)
Intoxicating but Controversial
First of all, Diane Lane is gorgeous- gorgeous enough to attract the attention of an inappropriately young & passionate man surrounded by old books. Richard Gere is Lane's husband. Both discover the lengths they are willing to go to for each other and to carry on.
This is an erotic, suspenseful, sometimes violent film, the themes of which will be recognized by fans of other films directed by Adrian Lyne.
Those who are sensitive to marital infidelity should pass on watching this. Married women over 40 are most likely to be intrigued.
Killshot (2008)
Great Cast
I watched this movie because Mickey Rourke & Diane Lane are both in it. Admittedly, I may have become somewhat biased in reviewing Rourke's films (because I am a big fan). What I most liked about the movie - the cast and the characters. The plot here is grim and this movie will not be everyone's "cup of tea."
Virgin River (2019)
Loved it at first; It now feels like "All My Children"
The scenery shown in the introduction is breathtaking. I definitely want to go wherever these shots were filmed. I also love the concept of a remote community populated by former city folk who have escaped to nature & found each other, while remaining close enough to civilization to remain civilized. Many of us would choose that life.
This series pulled me in during its first season and I looked forward to the characters' return. I began to realize by Season 3 that "Virgin River" was spinning in place- much like a tire stuck in mud or ice. I began to find it necessary to pause the show when family members walked in to preserve my dignity. I had to ask myself why I was watching something so shallow & unrealistic.
By season 4 (which admittedly, I looked forward to), I was reminded of being a teenager when I watched daytime soaps during the summer months, including "All My Children." Watching soaps was always an addictive escape. As to "All My Children," it was easy to catch up, considering that nothing much changed from August to Christmas break. There were always beautiful people portrayed as business tycoons who nonetheless appeared to have an unlimited amount of free time to pursue & dwell upon romance. In "Virgin River," we see a similar trend- of successful doctors, lawyers, brilliant people running a local restaurant, just hanging out, looking for love in unlikely places. "Virgin River" is full of delightful characters, unintended pregnancies, dubious paternity, brain injuries, baked goods & beautiful views. Much like "All My Children," "Virgin River" presents an opportunity for a pleasing escape. Sometimes that is exactly what we need & there should be no shame in that. Compared to other dramas of escape, I would give it a 10. However, anyone looking for depth & intellectual stimulation should look elsewhere. I have not read the book but the Netflix show is pure fantasy- a world where romance is prioritized & the characters always have time (and a willingness) to talk about their various relationships.
And Just Like That... (2021)
Just So Awful
I am a big fan of the original series. I have watched every episode more than once & am the same age as the 3 characters who returned for this horrendous cash grab. Following the 2nd movie (a ridiculous farce), I completely understood and respected Kim Catrall's decision to close that door for good. For the other characters to return without her was a risky proposition.
AJLT is a cringe fest, lacking in continuity, in which each of the main characters gets a new black/brown friend and the character of Miranda has been replaced by the real Cynthia Nixon (almost nothing of Miranda survives). The Carrie from SATC was perpetually broke but well dressed. Her outfits were often outrageous, eclectic- the clothes reflected the character. In AJLT, expensive clothes are meant to reflect wealth & success. Charlotte is the most recognizable character who has changed the least from the original show.
AJLT comes off as a vanity project cooked up by MPK and SJP where Carrie is now rich enough to buy whatever she wants & Miranda has become a lesbian- no longer career driven- who confuses sexual attraction for love, as if she is a naive teenager rather than an experienced and rational 55 year old. I am sorry I watched this train wreck and I will pass on Season 2.
The Rum Diary (2011)
Once Again, I Reject the Critics' Version
I decided to watch "The Rum Diary" after watching the defamation trial of Depp v Heard. While I have always been sufficiently intrigued by Johnny Depp, I am nerdy enough to have been more interested in the triumph of truth & justice over the fantastical tales of Amber Heard who appeared to view victimhood as a lucrative profession. After the trial, I wanted to see Depp & Heard as they were in the beginning- a far cry from accusing each other of vile acts
I went into the experience of watching this movie with no expectations. The film contained enough irreverence to keep me interested & amused. Depp - not surprisingly- knocked this oddball journalist role out of the park. This is another movie which focuses on characters- set in Puerto Rico, with a less than obvious triumph of principle over cynicism by Depp's character (if you can find it).
Ashby (2015)
Nice Surprise
I had never even heard of this movie until it became available on STARZ. I am a big Mickey Rourke fan and also have affection for all of the other actors in this film, including Kevin Dunn who plays a h.s. Football coach (I loved his neurotic character in VEEP). Mickey Rourke, Emma Roberts, Nat Wolf & Sarah Silverman complete the main cast. This is a "character" piece most of all, which focuses primarily upon the relationship between Rourke's character and that of the far younger Nat Wolf. The 2 are neighbors, the younger having recently moved into the Virginia neighborhood where "Ashby," resides alone. Wolf's character and his divorced mother (Silverman) have recently relocated to Virginia from Oregon, presumably as a result of divorce. Wolf's character is in high school and portrayed as a strange, but clever kid, clearly yearning for fatherly love & respect. Emma Roberts plays a classmate- similarly strange and clever. Without delay, Wolf's character discovers that Ashby is a retired CIA assassin. I don't want to spoil the plot (since there is one) but both parties learn from each other and find peace. Recommend.
Better Call Saul (2015)
Perfection
One of the best shows on television. Superb, sharp and intelligent writing and character development. Entertaining narrative, clever humor. This prequel to "Breaking Bad," explores the history of "Jimmy McGill," and his transition to Saul Goodman, the shady attorney who accepts bribes in Breaking Bad.