36
Metascore
7 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 58The Film StageJohn FinkThe Film StageJohn FinkUpon a first glance, the film is somewhat hollow an experience, offering trite dialogue and an on-the-nose message about beauty and the horrors of genetic engineering taken to their extreme.
- 50The Hollywood ReporterJohn DeForeThe Hollywood ReporterJohn DeForeWhile some will embrace the shards as a Shane Carruth-like brain-teaser, the movie is ultimately too reflective of its genetically-engineered subjects — soulless under an entrancing veneer.
- 50TheWrapApril WolfeTheWrapApril WolfeThe sheer number of artisans creating great work on this film does become a disappointment, though. Without a proper story or dialogue, what good is skin-deep beauty?
- 40VarietyAmy NicholsonVarietyAmy NicholsonWhat it means, Alcazar leaves open for interpretation. He’s more a mood maker than a story teller, and the film feels like people watching at a fancy party and inhaling different wafts of perfume.
- 40The New York TimesJeannette CatsoulisThe New York TimesJeannette CatsoulisThe upshot is an oppressive, inscrutable puzzle that made me more curious about the inside of Alcazar’s head than that of his tortured subject — the kind of movie that, in some circles, might inspire fetishistic rewatching. Just don’t forget to fire up the bong.
- 30Los Angeles TimesNoel MurrayLos Angeles TimesNoel MurrayPerfect also shows that striking images alone aren’t always enough. Alcazar and cinematographer Matthias Koenigswieser have concocted some fine illustrations. Now all they need is some decent text.
- 25Slant MagazineChuck BowenSlant MagazineChuck BowenEddie Alcazar’s film is a purposefully inscrutable, wandering, disconnected, symbolic, and highly precious mood bath.