24
Metascore
6 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 40Los Angeles TimesMichael WilmingtonLos Angeles TimesMichael WilmingtonIt lives on its action and dies on its gab. It also would have been better without all those songs about catching the thunder and grabbing the lightning and going for the glory. They sound like a rejected ad campaign for Old Milwaukee. In movies like this, action is often enough--but here, it's just not radical.
- 40EmpireWilliam ThomasEmpireWilliam ThomasAlmost palatable, with some fast-moving stunts but dreadful dialogue.
- 25TV Guide MagazineTV Guide MagazineConner's screen debut is inauspicious--to put it kindly--in the quality of both his acting and the material chosen, and someone else is obviously doing his riding.
- 25Miami HeraldBill CosfordMiami HeraldBill CosfordA measure of redemption is offered in an opening montage and in the climactic bike-race sequence; in each, the stunts of the stand-ins are breathtaking. In all other respects Rad, which was directed by Hal Needham (a former stunt man who "directed" the Smokey and the Bandit series) is crudely made, the visual equivalent of a 10-speed with training wheels. [2 Apr 1986, p.D6]
- 25The Globe and Mail (Toronto)The Globe and Mail (Toronto)Rad has the best opening credits sequence since the last James Bond picture, but it has nowhere to go from there. It doesn't even try. [3 Apr 1986, p.D6]
- 20The New York TimesWalter GoodmanThe New York TimesWalter GoodmanThe bicycle acrobatics behind the credits at the opening of Rad are so spectacular that you wonder what the movie can do to improve on them. The short answer is, nothing. It's a.ll uphill once the tale gets under way